Free 186 More Best Homemade Tools eBook:  
Get 2,000+ tool plans, full site access, and more.

User Tag List

Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: 1586 Tsar Cannon

  1. #1
    Jon
    Jon is online now Jon has agreed the Seller's Terms of Service
    Administrator
    Supporting Member
    Jon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Colorado, USA
    Posts
    25,451
    Thanks
    7,928
    Thanked 38,619 Times in 11,284 Posts

    1586 Tsar Cannon

    The Tsar Cannon is the largest-caliber cannon ever built. It was cast in bronze in 1586, by Andrey Chokhov in Russia, with a caliber of 35 inches, a length of 17.5 feet, and a weight of almost 40 tons.



    Ornately decorated, and mounted on a similarly ornate carriage, the Tsar Cannon was created largely as a symbol of might, and was displayed in the Kremlin for visiting diplomats to view, lest they consider aggressing against Russia.

    Interestingly, the Tsar Cannon observes the same manufacturing principles and naming convention of the Tsar Bell, which is the largest bell. Both are ornate, non-functional, and enormous. Note the similar aesthetic:



    It's difficult to tell if the Tsar Cannon was ever fired. It's missing a critical vent hole, and there are some questions about whether it could successfully fire the enormous cannon balls that are now placed beside it in a permanent display. Nevertheless, a 1980 restoration project found some gunpowder residue in the cannon.



    There's also some disagreement over whether it's technically a cannon, or a mortar, or was even intended as an enormous shotgun. A couple of replicas have been made over the years, but the original remains in beautiful shape.



    Previously: Punt guns

    186 More Best Homemade Tools eBook

  2. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Jon For This Useful Post:

    Rangi (Oct 19, 2019), Seedtick (Jan 1, 2017), Woodgeezr (Dec 29, 2016)

  3. #2
    Supporting Member Toolmaker51's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Location
    Midwest USA
    Posts
    5,330
    Thanks
    7,041
    Thanked 2,977 Times in 1,892 Posts

    Toolmaker51's Tools
    Counterpoint: The 16"/50 US Naval armament consumed a minimum 660lbs of powder and 66.6' barrel to propel a 1,900 to 2,700 pounds (850 to 1,200 kg) projectile at max speed of 2,690 feet per second (820 m/s) with a design range up to 24 miles (39 km). 24 mi at 2600 fps is almost a minute and a half time of flight!
    So, I'd venture the bore/ projectile [5700+lbs]/ and barrel length of the Tsar's conversation piece a non functional device. In 1586, being interior & exterior ballistics were not common topics, one would speculate visiting dignitaries stood more in awe than comprehension. It also seems to lack mechanism to elevate the bore for trajectory, or the traditional increased diameter, or truncate form to reinforce an enclosed breech. Gunpowder residue could and likely be remnants of saluting charges, and little more.
    I recommend as a comic representation, this youtube from 2:58 to 4:40,

    2000 Tool Plans
    Last edited by Toolmaker51; Jan 4, 2017 at 09:59 PM.
    Sincerely,
    Toolmaker51
    ...we'll learn more by wandering than searching...

  4. The Following User Says Thank You to Toolmaker51 For This Useful Post:

    Jon (Jan 4, 2017)

  5. #3
    Supporting Member Frank S's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2015
    Location
    Peacock TX
    Posts
    11,178
    Thanks
    1,974
    Thanked 8,766 Times in 4,195 Posts

    Frank S's Tools
    Just looking at the bore to barrel thickness ratio not even Tom Scholte's famous unobtainium used to construct the bore ship that descended through the earth's crust to the core that gained strength the higher the pressure and heat it was exposed to would be strong enough to withstand the blast pressure it would take just to make a 35" diameter ball clear the end of the barrel if it was elevated just a few degrees.



    186 More Best Homemade Tools eBook
    Never try to tell me it can't be done
    When I have to paint I use KBS products

  6. The Following User Says Thank You to Frank S For This Useful Post:

    mwmkravchenko (Nov 7, 2019)

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •