1950s Adcock and Shipley Universal Machine Tool - photos

The Adcock and Shipley Universal Machine Tool. Built in the 1950s, it was available in a small and large configuration, and included a screwcutting and power feed lathe, a cylindrical/universal grinder, a vertical/horizontal miller, and a drill. It was designed primarily for shipboard use, apparently used by at least both the British and New Zealand navies.

Here's the larger configuration:
https://diqn32j8nouaz.cloudfront.net...hine_tool1.jpg

https://diqn32j8nouaz.cloudfront.net...hine_tool2.jpg

And, a photo of the smaller configuration
https://diqn32j8nouaz.cloudfront.net...hine_tool3.jpg


More: Adcock & Shipley Combination Machine

Previously:

https://www.homemadetools.net/forum/...3703#post99821
https://www.homemadetools.net/forum/...0948#post73437
https://www.homemadetools.net/forum/...2828#post97238

A buffet of machining capability, serve six comfortably, or

Quintessential man cave edition of "The Beverly Hillbillies' fancy eatin' table https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8g_LkfsIuFw

I've always respected the British knack for intricate but useful design, (minus Joe Lucas). By anyone else, this would be an assembled basket case, parts hung on wherever it 'looked' like they belonged. You can see logic and very little compromise in the result, a lot of potential in far smaller foot print than equivalent machinery. Hard to imagine backstory on this; concept, patterns, castings, lube system, machining, fit & scrape work, tooling catalog...

Am I the only one that wishes this machine was a common find at the farm auction?

How do you move a thing like this? I mean like if you don't have a serious shipyard crane to make the lift?

Now that is what I call a work of art. I wonder if there are still any of them around or even in use? (They sure didn't need to put boulders in the keels of those ships as ballast).

While I do like the concept of the machine there are several points that I find would be a poor compromise to having such a conglomeration of machines on a single foot print. Don't get me wrong if one were available as a barn find I'd be right there trying to talk the guy out of it. The Horizontal mill feature appears to be the main feature of the whole machine because it is the only machine in the works which has unobstructed use. as a vertical mill you have only the Knee rise of the table for the Z axis so any angular milling would have to be done via sine or adjustable angle plate milling of compound angled surfaces or holes would require an elaborate set up fixture.
Having a surface grinder ona machine which possibly could have other functions running at the same time would be disastrous. The drill press in a claustrophobic location boxed in on 3 sides and 0.75" spindle hole in the lathe, Seriously? and I thought the less than 1.5" in all 3 of La-blond's is bad Lastly comes swarf clean up I'm quite sure my wife would divorce me if I asked her to help me clean that thing after a day's use.

Reference British creativity in machine design --- Years ago I worked with a bright metallurgist who was into old Jaguars. A favorite yarn of his was: "If you ask your average engineer to grab his right earlobe he will reach up with his right hand. But if you ask the same of a British automotive engineer he will reach over the top of his head with his left hand to make the grab." (Best demonstrated in person rather than explained in print.).
Another observation of British engineering from a century past ........ I still don't understand why all their steam locomotives had the cylinders inside the frame rails under the boiler. And then we cannot fail to mention the Arcs and Sparks department and Lucas, the Prince of Darkness.
I think I can get away with such ignobilities being able to trace my lineage back to one of Henry XIII's head chefs (or whatever they were called in the 17th century.)
But there are many things British I admire. I once had access to a Myford Super7 lathe. What a jewel! And back to the category of things automotive my vote for the triumph automotive accomplishment per unit of engineering input, the hill climb racer "Bloody Mary" with its twin JAP motorcycle engines and wood frame, is unmatched. And I can't fail to mention the category of absurd English mechanical contrivances that actually worked, the Frazer-Nash chain-gang transmission, which included a reverse "gear".

Yes, there is still one around. It lives in my workshop, and is still used on a regular basis.

I'd love to know how you transported it into your workshop. And if in pieces, how it came apart for transport.

Judging by responses, we seem centered on what transport and rigging issue were encountered, and what it's like to run.
Don't recall ever seeing an 'all-in-one' machine that was other than a bench-top sized configuration. Can simultaneous work remain in place while running another function? It appears so and probably the biggest selling point. I'm certain to market them, a special order versus mass production, made speculation an ordeal. An equivalent to immense radial drills, limited market, and dependent on tremendous amount of capital investment. Hate to think how many unappreciated examples went to scrap or otherwise lost.
While not ideal, so few solutions are; I admire the condensed element. Would like to have been the 'fly on wall' to see design evolve, and certainly the process of manufacture. That alone indicates serious product dedication, certainly an endeavor of not so compact small scale.

Since I have already cut this poor machine to the bone in post #6 As I said also there is proof of concept and ingenuity involved in its obvious deliberate design. Since it was as I understand it primarily designed for shipboard use Most likely aboard a smaller possibly cramped for space vessel As with most vessels the machine rooms and engine rooms are as low in the keel as possible The engines for obvious reasons. this machine due to its design meant you needed full access all the way around it so placing it near amidships directly over the spine of the keel where the ship would have the least motion would have been my choice. also the machine has one other characteristic unique to it that being the shared total mass and rigidity of a single large frame which all functions or work stations on the machine would have benefited from this. It is unlikely that more than a few of these were ever used simultaneously since there would have been probably only a machinist and maybe 2 machinist mates sharing duty under normal conditions.
As far as rigging to install or remove it this would have been done with the use of an "H" shaped spreader bar with a minimum of 4 rigging lines while it was still bolted to a shipping pallet made out of either a large wood frame work or a welded steel pallet the rigging lines would have been attached to special pocket hooks which would have been secured near each of the 4 corners these pockets can be seen in the first photo these pockets are also where some of the anchorages to secure the machine to the floor are

Frank S - thanks for the interesting read. Placement of this tool as you suggest makes sense. I had forgotten the importance of keeping that equipment low and amidships where it would experience the least motion in heavy seas. The rigging you suggest makes sense although it probably wouldn't be much help in getting the machine into a small building. But then I've seen some pretty clever professional machine mover do the darn near impossible with two big forklifts and operators who to say the least were a real team.
This does motivate some internet searching on the subject of machine shops aboard Navy ships and the roles of the machinery repairman rate. My one experience at sea was a 10 day reservist training cruise on a WWII Navy Gearing Class destroyerout of Norfolk, VA, that was nearing the end of it's life in 1963. Turned out the guy in the crew who gave everybody haircuts was a 1st class machinery repairman. We got to talking when I got a haircut and he ended up showing me the compartment where the shop was located, just aft of midships and one level above the main machinery deck. It had an about 12 inch lathe and drill press, all I remembered. No mill and if there was a bandsaw I didn't remember it. The whole setup wasn't much more than 8x10 feet.
I ended up going to OCS and sailing a desk in the Navy air training command for 3 years. The only other Navy ship I ever had a chance to look around was a nuclear attack submarine docked nearby the destroyer when we got back to port from the training cruise. And all I saw of the inside of that one was forward of "you can't go there without a security clearance" wall forward of the machinery. A bit cramped but noticeably better living quarters than on the tin can.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ed Weldon

I'd love to know how you transported it into your workshop. And if in pieces, how it came apart for transport.

---

I cheated on this one; poured 6" reinforced concrete, then when set, just had the machine unloaded onto the floor, then built the workshop extension around the machine.
Transport was flat bed truck with 20Ton HIAB, moved as one unit. All I did was to take off some of the smaller bits like tailstock, 4 jaw chuck, etc.

I have since dismantled parts like the grinder pedestal (mainly to get access to wiring conduits) but machine was in generally good condition and a full strip down wasn't really necessary.