Free 186 More Best Homemade Tools eBook:  
New: 300+ fresh build posts/day from 275 forums → BuildThreads.com

User Tag List

Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: Battleship being towed for scrapping - photo

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Supporting Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2020
    Posts
    116
    Thanks
    110
    Thanked 29 Times in 22 Posts
    I lean more with Ductape on his thoughts Marv. I count at least 9 housings for 5 inch guns. Looks like about 17 barrels for 16 inch rounds on the port side. 12 would be used for 4 turrets. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Montan...ntana_bb67.jpg

  2. #2
    Supporting Member mklotz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2015
    Location
    LA, CA, USA
    Posts
    3,720
    Thanks
    376
    Thanked 7,194 Times in 2,349 Posts

    mklotz's Tools
    Quote Originally Posted by astroscuba View Post
    I lean more with Ductape on his thoughts Marv. I count at least 9 housings for 5 inch guns. Looks like about 17 barrels for 16 inch rounds on the port side. 12 would be used for 4 turrets. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Montan...ntana_bb67.jpg
    The armament list here...

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Kentucky_(BB-6)

    shows BB-6 had 14 five inch guns although it doesn't indicate how mounted (e.g. dual turret or stand alone).

    The hull in the photo has only one aft barbette which rules out the planned Montana that would have had two aft barbettes for its two aft turrets.

    I'm fairly sure that construction of Montana or Kentucky never progressed far enough to mount the turrets or fit the guns.

    Also missing in the photo are any aft fittings for the two aircraft catapults and the aircraft recovery crane that were a feature of both the Iowa and Montana class battleships.

    One other possibility is that the stuff on the deck did not all come from the ship that was associated with the hull. The hull could be being used as a barge to transport other scrap to the breakers.
    ---
    Regards, Marv

    Smart phones are to people what laser pointers are to cats
    Homo sapiens is a goal, not a definition

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •