Printable View
Boeing C-17 Globemaster III taking off from a dusty airstrip.
<video controls autoplay loop> <source src="https://diqn32j8nouaz.cloudfront.net/c17_kicking_dust.mp4" type="video/mp4"> Your browser does not support the video tag. </video>
Previously:
https://www.homemadetools.net/forum/...147#post187984
https://www.homemadetools.net/forum/...753#post226023
https://www.homemadetools.net/forum/...326#post150487
https://www.homemadetools.net/forum/...160#post153697
I knew a guy who had something to do with producing turbine blades for aircraft in the Iraq war. He said dust just absolutely annihilates the turbine blades. They came up with some sort of hard coating that helped, but it's still a big problem.
That is one of the problems with sending hi performance aircraft to places that do not have pristine runways. They are just like big vacuum cleaners racing down the runway. Also LOTS more difficult to accelerate on that soft surface.
And why would you not mount several large JATO's to assist in getting off the ground faster to avoid any more dust than necessary. Oh, I forgot JATOs are no longer considered necessary because we have more powerful engines now.
I'd imagine a JATO powerful enough to make much difference on a loaded C-17 would have to be massive, too massive to fly with for very long at least.Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank S
The C17 is about 4 times heavier than the C130 and can carry more cargo than the loaded take-off weight of a C130. The C130 was equipped with 8 1000lb thrust 15 second burn rockets. So yeah, to similarly equip a C17 you would probably want to hang 32 rockets on it. This could be done with 4 pods of 8 then jettison the pods after take-off. The air frame is durable enough to handle an extra 30+ thousand lbs. boost. The idea is moot though since the last RATO/JATO rockets were used up with a few exceptions in 2009Quote:
Originally Posted by bob_3000