Free 186 More Best Homemade Tools eBook:  
New: 300+ fresh build posts/day from 275 forums → BuildThreads.com

User Tag List

Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: Drawing a circle with a carpenter's square - GIF

  1. #1
    Supporting Member
    Join Date
    May 2024
    Posts
    6,079
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 11,092 Times in 4,735 Posts

    Drawing a circle with a carpenter's square - GIF

    Drawing a circle with a carpenter's square.




    Previously:

    1868 six-sided carpenter's square - photo
    New: BuildThreads.com - 300+ build posts/day (with photos)

  2. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to ToolTalkBot For This Useful Post:

    cognitdiss (Feb 2, 2026), nova_robotics (Jan 31, 2026), rdarrylb (Jan 31, 2026)

  3. #2
    Supporting Member mklotz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2015
    Location
    LA, CA, USA
    Posts
    3,720
    Thanks
    376
    Thanked 7,190 Times in 2,348 Posts

    mklotz's Tools
    Yet another application of Thale's theorem.
    ---
    Regards, Marv

    Smart phones are to people what laser pointers are to cats
    Homo sapiens is a goal, not a definition

  4. The Following User Says Thank You to mklotz For This Useful Post:

    Frank S (Jan 30, 2026)

  5. #3
    Supporting Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Posts
    697
    Thanks
    322
    Thanked 322 Times in 209 Posts

    neilbourjaily's Tools
    aka the Intercept theorem. Yep, I know Thales discovered it about 2 1/2 millennia ago. Perhaps I am picking nits or fits, however I do agree it is time to rename theory and discovery away from the dead-old-white-man method of naming, especially as regards very old discoveries. It over celebrates the discoverer as opposed to the discovery. It tells us nothing about the nature of the discovery. It also suggest the DOWs were the only smart people about.
    I also consider the discovery of mathematics, processes, and physics to be just that, discoveries not inventions.

  6. #4
    Supporting Member mklotz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2015
    Location
    LA, CA, USA
    Posts
    3,720
    Thanks
    376
    Thanked 7,190 Times in 2,348 Posts

    mklotz's Tools
    Quote Originally Posted by neilbourjaily View Post
    aka the Intercept theorem. Yep, I know Thales discovered it about 2 1/2 millennia ago. Perhaps I am picking nits or fits, however I do agree it is time to rename theory and discovery away from the dead-old-white-man method of naming, especially as regards very old discoveries. It over celebrates the discoverer as opposed to the discovery. It tells us nothing about the nature of the discovery. It also suggest the DOWs were the only smart people about.
    I also consider the discovery of mathematics, processes, and physics to be just that, discoveries not inventions.
    Good luck with that. I suggest you write a detailed explanation of how you intend to accomplish the switchover and then nail it to the dark side of the moon where it will get the attention it deserves.
    ---
    Regards, Marv

    Smart phones are to people what laser pointers are to cats
    Homo sapiens is a goal, not a definition

  7. #5
    Supporting Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Posts
    697
    Thanks
    322
    Thanked 322 Times in 209 Posts

    neilbourjaily's Tools
    Quote Originally Posted by mklotz View Post
    Good luck with that. I suggest you write a detailed explanation of how you intend to accomplish the switchover and then nail it to the dark side of the moon where it will get the attention it deserves.
    With all warmth, Marv, I too come from the DOW teaching/naming era. S-l-o-w-l-y, universities and colleges are addressing the matter. The finished outcome is unlikely to come until long after my bones have mouldered away, by which time the dark side of the moon may be colonized. And certainly there will be resistance along the way. However, newly discovered processes and theoremata are now more commonly named after the matter at hand and less commonly after their discoverers. Consider Dr. Einstein: none of what he discovered did he name for himself, though indeed others did eponymously name some of his theories.

  8. #6
    Supporting Member cognitdiss's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2021
    Location
    SF Bay Area, CA
    Posts
    74
    Thanks
    269
    Thanked 34 Times in 22 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by neilbourjaily View Post
    With all warmth, Marv, I too come from the DOW teaching/naming era. S-l-o-w-l-y, universities and colleges are addressing the matter. The finished outcome is unlikely to come until long after my bones have mouldered away, by which time the dark side of the moon may be colonized. And certainly there will be resistance along the way. However, newly discovered processes and theoremata are now more commonly named after the matter at hand and less commonly after their discoverers. Consider Dr. Einstein: none of what he discovered did he name for himself, though indeed others did eponymously name some of his theories.
    Therefore consider Thales, as he too named nothing after himself, and know you have mooted your own argument.

    Per Wikipedia:

    It is generally attributed to Thales of Miletus, but it is sometimes attributed to Pythagoras.

    History

    Thales of Miletus (early 6th century BC) is traditionally credited with proving the theorem; however, even by the 5th century BC there was nothing extant of Thales' writing, and inventions and ideas were attributed to men of wisdom such as Thales and Pythagoras by later doxographers based on hearsay and speculation.[2][3] Reference to Thales was made by Proclus (5th century AD), and by Diogenes Laėrtius (3rd century AD) documenting Pamphila's (1st century AD) statement that Thales "was the first to inscribe in a circle a right-angle triangle".[4]



    2,500+ Tool Plans

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •