I feel so much better now...
Attachment 43948
Printable View
I feel so much better now...
Attachment 43948
Interesting; this relates to local anti-nuclear legislation: https://berkeley.municipal.codes/BMC/12.90.030 . Turns out we have one of those in Colorado too: https://library.municode.com/co/boul...SASA_CH8NUFRZO
Essentially a feel good law that consumes tax dollars and adds bureaucracy. There is a good perspective on it here: https://www.dailycal.org/2018/08/08/...e-consequences . They should sue the sun, because it's a nuclear reactor.
The polar opposite would be this DIY fallout shelter video from the National Archives:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OHmGn-oL2uU
Local council political statement, much favoured by the left in Europe too.
A concrete ceiling would have been a good addition instead of wooden floor joists.
From the video, "Ruth and I can live in here very comfortably for at least 2 weeks". I from my understanding, if you have a real fallout situation, hiding for 2 weeks is not really going to be of much help.
Ain't that the truth, after a nuclear exchange you can expect to be sheltering for MANY months and with the infrastructure severely damaged no one is coming to help. That type of shelter would be handy for tornado prone areas.
We should send a bunch of those signs to trouble spots all over the world!!! That would solve so many problems!!!! :smash:Quote:
Originally Posted by mklotz
Yeah. The declarations of "Gun Free Zone" are working miracles........Quote:
Originally Posted by hemmjo
This reminds me of Marv K's observation on California Proposition 65, where 100's and 100's of compounds, elements, every day materials are declared 'known carcinogens"; including the very signage warnings appear on.
Mr. K hypothesized suing the state for proliferating the issue.
Let''s see, entire gang of leftist liberal loonies against 1 Marv.
Calculating......... (insert strung out calculation here amid humorous pops and beeps)
They don't stand a chance.
Attachment 44091 “Never argue with an idiot. They will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.” ― Mark Twain
I have tried to follow that advice for a long time. But this may not always be the right way to deal with idiots.
Check out this headline, "City of Columbus plans to sue Hyundai, Kia over vehicle thefts"
They arrest these kids almost daily, yet, the same kids are still stealing cars. We are talking about 12-13-14 year old kids, repeatedly stealing cars. They don't even chop them up to sell for parts. They just steal them, drive them around town crashing into people, cars, buildings, ponds, killing people. Sometimes themselves.
Yep, lets sue the car makers, that will fix this!!!!!!
Why not sue FakeBook, Insta-Spam, and the other "services" for spreading information allowing this to happen.
OR,
Better yet, sue Ajay Bhatt of Intel and the USB-IF (USB Implementers Forum, Inc). The organization is comprised of industry leaders like Intel, Microsoft, Compaq, LSI, Apple and Hewlett-Packard that developed USB? :smash:
Yes "Gun free zones" turning the law abiding into easily targeted, highlighted as safe for armed criminals, disarmed victims works everytime.Quote:
Originally Posted by Toolmaker51
Commifonicators Prop 65 is equally stupid, I buy US made toxic/explosive gas pressure control regulators (APTech) for our semi-con work, everyone has the Prop 65 stickers attached, regulators are made from stainless steel with a tiny amount of PEEK in the seat, the gases they'll be handling are far more and more immediately dangerous.
Industry bias from neighbouring states? Political bias, DA won't prosecute the thieves through ideological beliefs/fear of being accused of racial bias (highly likely given the 'stars' on the 'Kia-boys' videos)?Quote:
Originally Posted by hemmjo
I've been long convinced, on the majority of issues lacking enforcement, are simply due to lawmakers prodded by attorneys, lobbyists, activists in general; instead of voting public.
It applies equally to self-serving (therefore undeserved) perks received, that are not available to the public.
And that applies equally to legislation (such as Obama-care) threatening citizens who cared not participate with fines or worse, of programs handed out to illegals. It's all about votes, long before acts of harvesting, sort of fertilizing potential crops.
It's a great test of censorship, to lay out such a theory and await it's sudden disappearance. Some of us take that to mean hitting too close to the truth, despite labels of 'mis-information'.
I'm working on another lawsuit based on their failure to protect us from a known nuclear threat - the sun.Quote:
Originally Posted by Toolmaker51
They've allowed us to live unprotected in close (93E6 miles is "close" in the context of astronomical distances) proximity to an UNSHIELDED, FUSION reactor of enormous power that is constantly bombarding us with radiation including neutrinos that can pass unhindered through the entire planet. The earth's magnetic field provides some protection but it has a history of periodic reversals and has no effect on neutrinos. In such reversals population centers may not be protected for unknown intervals of time.
They must immediately supply every person on earth with a lead umbrella while they construct an acceptable plan to...
shield the earth from the sun (gonna play hell with solar power generation but it has to be done)
cement the sphere of liquid iron at the center of the earth in place so the magnetic field cannot reverse
create a committee to study methods of halting neutrinos with devices made only from organic materials
send a delegation to the sun to examine the safety measures now in place
OK, I admit I've taken liberties with the physics but do you really believe there is a politician who knows enough physics to catch me? Remember, the object here is to involve them so deeply with a manufactured emergency so scary that the public and the media demand that they work on the problem, hopefully so demanding that they don't have time to make legislation that matters.
Funny that Marv admits taking liberties with physics, while just being illustrative not legislative.
The left creates (destroys?) liberties (adverse effects) with most everything they enact.
Despite every bit of counsel and research they are offered.
If that doesn't spell (smell) of outside influence, don't know what does.
