Free 186 More Best Homemade Tools eBook:  
New: 300+ fresh build posts/day from 275 forums → BuildThreads.com

User Tag List

Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: Trenchless pipe installation - GIF

  1. #1
    Supporting Member
    Join Date
    May 2024
    Posts
    6,171
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 11,278 Times in 4,817 Posts

    Trenchless pipe installation - GIF

    Trenchless pipe installation.





    Previously:

    New: BuildThreads.com - 300+ build posts/day (with photos)

  2. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to ToolTalkBot For This Useful Post:

    emu roo (Yesterday), Floradawg (Today), nova_robotics (Yesterday)

  3. #2
    Supporting Member hemmjo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    Posts
    3,310
    Thanks
    411
    Thanked 2,139 Times in 1,234 Posts

    hemmjo's Tools
    How is that pipe installation?

  4. The Following User Says Thank You to hemmjo For This Useful Post:

    emu roo (Yesterday)

  5. #3
    Supporting Member Karl_H's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Posts
    1,251
    Thanks
    865
    Thanked 801 Times in 464 Posts

    Karl_H's Tools
    Quote Originally Posted by hemmjo View Post
    How is that pipe installation?
    If you question was rhetorical - stop here, but note that the pipe being split was installed trenchless since it is laying above th ground.

    If you were asking a real question - a stiff but bendable pipe is fitted into the female end of the splitter and is pulled through the void created by splitting the old pipe.
    Last edited by Karl_H; Yesterday at 04:26 PM. Reason: Correcting autocorrect.

  6. The Following User Says Thank You to Karl_H For This Useful Post:

    emu roo (Yesterday)

  7. #4
    Supporting Member desbromilow's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    916
    Thanks
    560
    Thanked 457 Times in 276 Posts

    desbromilow's Tools
    be nice to have the split at the bottom so the remains of the old pipe could double as armour for the new pipe. it would probably cause "lift" though

  8. The Following User Says Thank You to desbromilow For This Useful Post:

    emu roo (Yesterday)

  9. #5
    Supporting Member hemmjo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    Posts
    3,310
    Thanks
    411
    Thanked 2,139 Times in 1,234 Posts

    hemmjo's Tools
    I do notice that the pulling hear is designed for a pipe to follow it through the ground. A lot of pipe was replaced around here using a similar concept, but the new pipe was size ti fit into the old. I see two situations in the video..

    #1 the pipe is buried less than 1 pipe diameter under sand which totally collapses as the cutting head is pulled through. We have no idea how long that pipe runs under the sand. The set up appears to be staged as the pipe daylights into a wood box set into soft sand. That is a big pulling head. The bend radius for a pipe that size to large fot the pipe to follow i into that box.

    #2 we see a section pf pipe resting on pallets and connected what I assume is the pulling machine. If that pipe was in fact buried in any number common of substrates, those jagged edges created by the cutter would not be able to flay away like that and would possibly even be pressed back onto place with the jagged edges slicing into the new plastic pipe.

    Interesting concept, I just have questions about real world use.

  10. #6
    Supporting Member Frank S's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2015
    Location
    Peacock TX
    Posts
    12,628
    Thanks
    2,684
    Thanked 11,129 Times in 5,404 Posts

    Frank S's Tools
    Quote Originally Posted by hemmjo View Post
    I do notice that the pulling hear is designed for a pipe to follow it through the ground. A lot of pipe was replaced around here using a similar concept, but the new pipe was size ti fit into the old. I see two situations in the video..

    #1 the pipe is buried less than 1 pipe diameter under sand which totally collapses as the cutting head is pulled through. We have no idea how long that pipe runs under the sand. The set up appears to be staged as the pipe daylights into a wood box set into soft sand. That is a big pulling head. The bend radius for a pipe that size to large fot the pipe to follow i into that box.

    #2 we see a section pf pipe resting on pallets and connected what I assume is the pulling machine. If that pipe was in fact buried in any number common of substrates, those jagged edges created by the cutter would not be able to flay away like that and would possibly even be pressed back onto place with the jagged edges slicing into the new plastic pipe.

    Interesting concept, I just have questions about real world use.
    As you have mentioned there are a few questions about the operation.
    To me this appears to be a demonstration or a test to prove or disprove the possibility to replace a section of an old pipeline which probably runs under an existing structure such as a building or a road most likely a road. In which case would be buried several feet below the surface and yes, the substrate the pipeline would be buried in would be restrictive. I doubt that it could be substantial enough to cause the split pipe to collapse back in on the new pipe being pulled through with enough force to damage it however you are correct in that the severed edges would probably not flyaway as freely as the demonstration suggests.
    My question is what tonnage of force would be required to split spread and pull a new pipeline through the old pipe given that it would be as we believe would be buried several feet below the surface.
    I do a lot of work for a contractor who regularly pulls pipe under roads after boring. He has tried to pull 6" pipes through a bore that was not several inches larger than the pipe A 6" pipe cannot easily be pulled through even a 7" bore. He has tried to use expanders that I have made for him his machines have 100 tons of pulling power but trying to pull an expander of 8" in diameter through a 7" bore hole or 60 feet in length while dragging a 6" pipe which is close to 7" OD requires nearly all of the machine's capacity. Having to start and stop to remove the drill pipe sections is where the problems arrize
    Last edited by Frank S; Today at 07:12 AM.
    Never try to tell me it can't be done
    When I have to paint I use KBS products

  11. The Following User Says Thank You to Frank S For This Useful Post:

    hemmjo (Today)

  12. #7
    Supporting Member Karl_H's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Posts
    1,251
    Thanks
    865
    Thanked 801 Times in 464 Posts

    Karl_H's Tools
    My son had this done in Philly. They dug a 2x2 hole through the basement concrete where the cast iron left the building, and another hole 60-70 feet away where the cast iron met the city line.
    This was possible because the entire line was still patent, though with lots of damage and places where collapse was imminent.
    Here is an animation of the process:


  13. #8
    Supporting Member hemmjo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    Posts
    3,310
    Thanks
    411
    Thanked 2,139 Times in 1,234 Posts

    hemmjo's Tools
    At 32 seconds, " the new polyethylene pipe is rated to last 50 years" 50 years is not really a very line time. I used to think 30 years was old, but now I am 77, 50 years is just the blink of an eye!!!

  14. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to hemmjo For This Useful Post:

    Floradawg (Today), Frank S (Today), Karl_H (Today)

  15. #9
    Supporting Member Floradawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2018
    Location
    Flora, MS
    Posts
    1,488
    Thanks
    2,124
    Thanked 452 Times in 347 Posts

    Floradawg's Tools
    I think they mean at a minimum, 50 years. It seems to me it could last much longer.

    This is an interesting explanation for why time speeds up as you age.

    Stupid is forever, ignorance can be fixed.

  16. #10
    Supporting Member Frank S's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2015
    Location
    Peacock TX
    Posts
    12,628
    Thanks
    2,684
    Thanked 11,129 Times in 5,404 Posts

    Frank S's Tools
    Quote Originally Posted by Floradawg View Post
    I think they mean at a minimum, 50 years. It seems to me it could last much longer.

    This is an interesting explanation for why time speeds up as you age.

    Never ask a physicist a philosophical question about time if you are not prepared for the answer.



    2,500+ Tool Plans
    Never try to tell me it can't be done
    When I have to paint I use KBS products

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 8 users browsing this thread. (1 members and 7 guests)

  1. Karl_H

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •