Free 186 More Best Homemade Tools eBook:  
Get tool plans

User Tag List

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2
Results 11 to 18 of 18

Thread: Spring Cut Off Evolution! An Easy to make design + the PLANS

  1. #11
    Supporting Member winkys workshop's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2020
    Location
    Kentucky
    Posts
    181
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked 455 Times in 122 Posts

    winkys workshop's Tools
    >>One problem that many may not consider is the axial position of the cutting edge from the tool-post centerline which induces a rocking couple that I believe is a big problem on lightly built machines that lack rigidity.

    You hit the nail on the head.

    186 More Best Homemade Tools eBook

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to winkys workshop For This Useful Post:

    Toolmaker51 (Feb 6, 2022)

  3. #12
    Supporting Member Toolmaker51's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Location
    Midwest USA
    Posts
    5,336
    Thanks
    7,044
    Thanked 3,012 Times in 1,901 Posts

    Toolmaker51's Tools
    re post *8. Only limitation seen, won't the extended front will interfere with substantial diameters or mid-point in a bar? Winky's puts the motion above and behind, long the accepted arrangement.

    re chip ejection, I use the hollow top ground variety most often as well. According to sense of touch, sight and sound [in that order] binding occurs that instant before chip breaks off. That depresses tool tip, deepening the cut into unreleased material...
    Avoiding the nub that remains, can addressed grinding a shallow angle on the 'right' side that will penetrate it on the part side first.

    All in all, my parting usually goes to some depth in proportion to diameter [bigger = less depth] and finish via horizontal band saw. It's one off production, of pump sleeves and slip rings, again silicon bronze. The investment in time - materials - and reinstalling a critical pump make it sensible.
    When possible we also part off in a different sequence; boring ID a bit deeper [blade width] than part requirement. That greatly reduces penetration from outside; with both sides concentric, part breaks away predictably.

    2,000+ Tool Plans
    Last edited by Toolmaker51; Feb 7, 2022 at 01:27 AM.
    Sincerely,
    Toolmaker51
    ...we'll learn more by wandering than searching...

  4. The Following User Says Thank You to Toolmaker51 For This Useful Post:

    uv8452 (Feb 9, 2022)

  5. #13
    CanBeDone's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2019
    Posts
    43
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 38 Times in 18 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by winkys workshop View Post
    A few observation: The second tool works on smaller stock and or when the lathe is in back gear (very slow). If you are in the US I can ship you the first two if you want... you can keep them. .
    Thanks, Winky, but I live in New Zealand, so that is out. It would have made a nice research project, comparing a number of different designs and establishing what really makes a parting off tool effective.

  6. #14
    CanBeDone's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2019
    Posts
    43
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 38 Times in 18 Posts
    [QUOTE=Toolmaker51;197288]re post *8. Only limitation seen, won't the extended front will interfere with substantial diameters or mid-point in a bar? Winky's puts the motion above and behind, long the accepted arrangement.
    /QUOTE]

    Not on my machine, since I consider parting off from a bar of not more than 25 mm diameter. That gives me more than 100 mm free space below the bar to put the toolholder into. But if I needed to frequently part off rings from a 100mm tube, that would be an entirely different kettle of fish.

    My key question remains, however: Why does Winky have great success with one toolholder, and when he builds a second one to the same design, why does it fail? Or, to put it in a much broader perspective, Why do we have such a great variety of toolholder designs, not just for parting-off tooling, but also for form tools and even "simple" clean-up operations, and why do so many of them produce poor surface quality cuts? Not under all circumstances, of course, but I experience it again and again, and hear others complaining about it as well. So it is not just my incompetence as a machinist, because sometimes I do produce mirror-like surfaces, but not always. And always is what I want, predictably, whenever I try it.

    And Winky's admission of a "Failure" has triggered a chain of thought that might lead to a much better understanding of how to design a toolholder that predictably produces a mirror surface. Last night I had success designing a test rig that I can build given my resources, and that would give me the measurements I need to decide where Winky's builds failed. - That is if I can convince Winky to ship his "Failures" to New Zealand, together with a new toolbit of the same design he uses, so that I can get an idea of what is going on. Obviously, I will reimburse you, Winky.

    Another if: to generalize from what works on my lathe to what works on any lathe, I would need access to another lathe, preferably one that is very different in capabilities from my own. Since that would involve physical traveling in a Covid affected world, I would want to restrict this lathe to be somewhere in the Waikato.

  7. The Following User Says Thank You to CanBeDone For This Useful Post:

    Toolmaker51 (Feb 7, 2022)

  8. #15
    Supporting Member Toolmaker51's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Location
    Midwest USA
    Posts
    5,336
    Thanks
    7,044
    Thanked 3,012 Times in 1,901 Posts

    Toolmaker51's Tools
    Interesting prospects. I did not consider 1"/ 25mm as your maximum. The physics of cut off make a mirror finish unlikely. Some materials have more potential, but very limited in respect to metallics. The only mirror or close specification I recall on any print would be O-ring grooves, as the seal has trouble when surface roughness keeps it from moving into it's seat.
    I'm glad about so much participation the subject pulls in, there is no hard and fast guarantee in grooving and parting.
    Sincerely,
    Toolmaker51
    ...we'll learn more by wandering than searching...

  9. The Following User Says Thank You to Toolmaker51 For This Useful Post:

    uv8452 (Feb 9, 2022)

  10. #16
    Supporting Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2019
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    133
    Thanks
    488
    Thanked 101 Times in 37 Posts

    uv8452's Tools
    Dear CanBeDone,
    "The standard explanation adds a third argument...." I have learned a fourth and practice it: Since it is resonance, I reduce the cutting speed.
    Ulrich

  11. #17
    Supporting Member Floradawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2018
    Location
    Flora, MS
    Posts
    939
    Thanks
    753
    Thanked 198 Times in 154 Posts

    Floradawg's Tools
    Quote Originally Posted by winkys workshop View Post
    This is the second version of my spring cut-off tool. This design moves the point of flex toward the point of cut which makes the tool retract more under load. The concept is fairly easy to understand (see part one) but the amount of flex and where it flexes is a bit of a guess. I've used the tool at various speeds, feeds and diameters and it seems to be fairly forgiving. I like it!
    I think version 2 is less rigid than version 1 because it is not welded. Even though there is an interference fit, the slot is very shallow and just the screws can't prevent flexure.
    Stupid is forever, ignorance can be fixed.

  12. #18
    Content Editor
    Supporting Member
    DIYer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    3,055
    Thanks
    793
    Thanked 1,891 Times in 1,686 Posts


    Thanks winkys workshop! We've added your Spring Cut Off Tool to our Lathe Accessories category,
    as well as to your builder page: winkys workshop's Homemade Tools. Your receipt:






    2,000+ Tool Plans
    New plans added on 12/02/2024: Click here for 2,609 plans for homemade tools.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •