women working in jobs

Many countries in the world restrict women from working in jobs deemed hazardous, arduous, or mentally inappropriate. In certain industries, women are restricted from working in mining or construction. Sexual harassment has forced some cities to dedicate women-only trains and buses, or paint in pink designated areas for women, and restricted women from working at night. More than 90% of work-related deaths are Men! Where are the Feminists fighting for equal deaths? When the job is appealing, Feminism insists men and women are the same. But when the job is laborious, Feminism insists men and women are different! Women want 50% of managerial roles, but they don't care about the 50% of laborious jobs performed by bricklayers, builders, equipment drivers, miners, plumbers, mechanics, firefighters, rescue workers, demining workers, etc. When was the last time you saw a sign on the road that says, "Women At Work"?

There are serious biological differences between men and women. They are not the same mentally, emotionally, and physically. A woman can support a 4kg. baby/ babies in her belly but cannot support a 25kg. military backpack. Women were designed differently to play different roles. Men and women perceive the world in different ways and both perceptions are necessary for the survival of the Family "The Core of Society". They balance each other out and create HARMONY.

I don't see it that way. to generalize women as a whole, being weaker physically phycologically deficient for some jobs is pure bunk, true enough many are but many are every bit as qualified as a man for most jobs. The same as saying men as a whole are better in construction work. Society is to blame for creating the women can't do this or can't do that thing, By the same token society has created the effeminate male. Yes, there are countries which perceive women just as you stated. some will not allow women to drive or work outside the home, the exception being when a woman would be better suited than a man for the job. particularly in the medical fields A male gynecologist would be extremely frowned upon
I think a large percentage of men prefer managerial work as opposed to working in the trades as well.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Frank S

I don't see it that way. to generalize women as a whole, being weaker physically phycologically deficient for some jobs is pure bunk, true enough many are but many are every bit as qualified as a man for most jobs. The same as saying men as a whole are better in construction work. Society is to blame for creating the women can't do this or can't do that thing, By the same token society has created the effeminate male. Yes, there are countries which perceive women just as you stated. some will not allow women to drive or work outside the home, the exception being when a woman would be better suited than a man for the job. particularly in the medical fields A male gynecologist would be extremely frowned upon
I think a large percentage of men prefer managerial work as opposed to working in the trades as well.

---

You don't see it that way because you insist on self-deceit yourself despite the obvious. And that is not humanity's problem anyway.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mansworld

You don't see it that way because you insist on self-deceit yourself despite the obvious. And that is not humanity's problem anyway.

---

If she is as qualified as a man for most jobs, then how come since Independence, no woman ever became the President of the United States? And why only 5% of commercial pilots around the world are women? Why does the US Navy restrict women from working in submarines? Why women are not drafted into the military to fight on the front lines and do all the tough deeds that are expected of a man? If she is as qualified as a man then there can be no picking and choosing, women MUST take on ALL things that men get, positive and negative. So, what is your punk opinion now?

Contorting what women aren't allowed to do, won't do, can't do, does not hang on qualifications alone.

To start; that a female not been President yet, neglects their right to vote nationally not granted until when? 1919. Relatively sure that was not self imposed. Women heads of state & corporations? Queen Elizabeth II United Kingdom, ambulance driver and mechanic WWII. Benazir Bhutto, first elected woman in Pakistan. Indira Gandhi, India. Golda Meir, Israel. Mary Barra, General Motors and prime initiator of the C8 Corvette. Laura Wontrop-Klauser, Chevrolet’s Sports Car Racing Program Mgr. Marie Curie. Jane Goodall...don't google women scientists, mathematicians, Manhattan Project, aviators, the thousands of US code breakers, not to mention a few criminals.

Females been on larger surface vessels for quite some time. Took considerable re-engineering of existing capital ships insuring proper accommodations, as none were designed as such. Including that on subsequent vessels started at that time. The living quarters aboard subs didn't even include bunks for each male crewmember; since then, in USN, of 70 active submarines in the fleet, enlisted women serve aboard one ballistic-missile and four guided-missile submarines.
HMNS also open to woman crewmembers, in a smaller fleet they're looking to achieve ratio of 25%.
Land and air forces incorporate women easier than naval variety can.
US Army has women paratroopers, tank commanders, high level officers.
USAF has all kinds of women pilots, almost 70,000 women overall.
Some nations aren't successful doing so, from not only cultural rejection of it, but religious mindsets. Israel is just one.
Implying that women be drafted is illogical, the entire US military has been 100% volunteer since 1976. With most recent draft ending 30 June 1973, on a three year obligation.
Women on the front lines against certain adversaries are targeted as high value prisoners over males, for social, political and worse reasons. US border perfect example; cartels on one side, agenda pushing lobbyists on the other.

In WWII there were notable active women snipers, especially in Russia. In other European countries, conducting even while under occupation, as guerillas. For US, they comprised large portion of pilots ferrying planes from assembly plants. Most already knew flight, in varying degrees.
In South America, one country (Peru? Chile? Argentina?) mountain villages were subject to bandit raids seasonally; because males went on extended work in petroleum fields. That country armed the female residents; the raids stopped.

The biggest part of women not allowed participation of military and certain jobs is molded right into your ranting posts; "they can't", less an iota from Taliban banning girls education beyond sixth grade.

Mentoring middle/ high school students in STEM and FIRST Robotics programs; some females haven't the knack coming in, entering chiefly on interest alone. Male or female, part of that lack due to stereotyping, then lacking exposure to potential interests. From what role model? Past 2 or 2-1/2 generations there are men who own NO tools, can't read a tape measure, operate a hacksaw, or comprehend most assembly instructions.

I'd far rather teach interested females to read a micrometer and run an engine lathe or a 3000 ton injection molding machine than ANY male. Too many males are loaded with ill-directed bravado, too ignorant to recognize danger and potential injuries, let alone put that aside and pay attention. A safe bet; 50% here taught a woman to shoot with surprising if not exceptional results.

Can also personally relate, within the very safest manufactured products on Earth a collection of electronic and electro-mechanical devices (all on micro and sub-micro scale) are primarily built by women, I'd estimate 20 or 25 to 1, over men. That has precedent, incalculable volume of war material supplied to all Allies of WWII.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dzISmsfQM0E

That might occupy deniers for a minute.