AI generated heartfelt letter to parent - GIF

In this chapter of our Brave New Fake World: a tech demo at a conference. The technology being demonstrated is ChatGPT, which is being touted as "Artificial Intelligence". It's really just an LLM (Large Language Model) that identifies relationships between words in a conversation-like manner. This is useful technology, kinda like an easier to use search engine. But it's no more "artificial intelligence" than a dishwasher.

This little bit shows how ChatGPT can be used to compose a letter. Also useful, perhaps if you need to write a letter to your insurance company documenting a claim, or your bank confirming your account ownership.

Here they demonstrate, complete with touching piano music, how ChatGPT was used to compose a heartfelt letter from a daughter to her father, expressing her love for him.

<video controls autoplay loop>
<source src="https://diqn32j8nouaz.cloudfront.net/llm_artificially_composed_letter.mp4" type="video/mp4">
Your browser does not support the video tag.
</video>


Previously:

https://www.homemadetools.net/forum/...053#post224487
https://www.homemadetools.net/forum/...623#post223114

“O brave new world!” (said Miranda).
Does this render English teachers redundant?

Universities are already having problems screening for students cheating. Previously the professors had a simple way to see if they were copy-pasting existing text from the internet. But the LLMs can generate unique text and even style it accordingly, based on an existing writing sample.

The newer image recognition abilities might be more useful.

<video controls loop>
<source src="https://diqn32j8nouaz.cloudfront.net/llm_image_recognition_cell.mp4" type="video/mp4">
Your browser does not support the video tag.
</video>


https://diqn32j8nouaz.cloudfront.net...ecognition.jpg


Programmers are definitely sweating. Not only can it generate computer code with a text prompt, but it can do so by reading images or whiteboard diagrams.

<video controls loop>
<source src="https://diqn32j8nouaz.cloudfront.net/llm_whiteboard_mockup_to_code.mp4" type="video/mp4">
Your browser does not support the video tag.
</video>

The stack of street signs is bureaucracy, not artificial intelligence.

Now that I think about it, disregard this comment.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Philip Davies

“O brave new world!” (said Miranda).
Does this render English teachers redundant?

---

I often wish I would have paid a lot more attention to most of my English teachers. I almost gave a little too much attention to one of my high school teachers though.

That's nothing. GPT4 is f'n incredible. I was having a conversation with it about the flow through a nozzle a few months ago. Then just for kicks I asked it to write a program to simulate the flow through a nozzle. In about a minute that thing had written a very complicated program, including all of the required dimensions with perfectly commented code, it knew that it needed to use Navier-Stokes and not only did it understand the equations, it wrote C code to implement those equations within the context of the problem. Super advanced stuff, and I didn't direct it on any of these things. It just knew what it needed to solve the problem. If you handed the exact same problem to a person it would probably require someone with a Masters level education and it would take them all day to do. GPT4 cranked it in around a minute. It's mind blowing. It can write just about anything, including technical papers and diagrams.

The only problem is it has a very detectable writing style once you get familiar with it. It's very... flamboyant, for lack of a better term. If you get it to write anything you have to de-fluff the document afterwards.

I still get issues with what they call AI "hallucinations". It will answer a question confidently and in detail, but it will be point-blank wrong. Sometimes I will ask it if it is certain about its answer, and then it will apologize and provide the correct answer.

I think those are largely kinks that are being worked out of the system now that it's being trained on a larger population.

But yes, the era of third-world coders cranking out if/else statements is probably over.

I'm not seeing much value from it yet for in-depth information on building tools.

As for the AI image generators, here is what they think of a homemade table saw, bandsaw, lathe, and screwdriver. The well-coiffed gentleman uh, "operating" the lathe has the classic AI six-finger error.

https://diqn32j8nouaz.cloudfront.net/ai_table_saw.jpg

https://diqn32j8nouaz.cloudfront.net/ai_bandsaw.jpg

https://diqn32j8nouaz.cloudfront.net/ai_lathe.jpg

https://diqn32j8nouaz.cloudfront.net...crewdriver.jpg

All I can say is the guy working on that lathe like contraption should steer clear of Inigo Montoya. Or at least have that death ray ready when Inigo shows up!

My former boss was able to get a lot of useful Powershell done with ChatGPT; I suspect it's because the underlying LLM dataset includes a LOT of sample and posted code as well as engineering texts and technical documents etc. This is probably a very good use case for AI.

Getting it to 'paint' stuff is more problematic.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by bruce.desertrat

All I can say is the guy working on that lathe like contraption should steer clear of Inigo Montoya. Or at least have that death ray ready when Inigo shows up!

---

Couldn't resist:

https://diqn32j8nouaz.cloudfront.net..._lathe_gun.jpg

The six fingered guy would make a good left handed guitarist...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Jon

Couldn't resist:

https://diqn32j8nouaz.cloudfront.net..._lathe_gun.jpg

---

Is that an AI generated gun lathe? or maybe a lathe gun :rimshot:

Here's a classic: Goody2 AI Chat.

It's a satirical ultra-woke "responsible" AI chatbot. Example query:

https://diqn32j8nouaz.cloudfront.net/goody_2_ai.jpg

A funny response to how, when these AI chatbots were first released to the masses, people asked them all of their politically incorrect questions, often covering forbidden topics about race and gender. For example: Why are there male and female leagues in chess competitions?

The original AI chatbots would answer honestly, stating that differing representation among groups may be a result of natural differences among those groups.

The companies training the AIs got in trouble for this, as screenshots of these responses were shared on the net. So they modified the training of the AIs such that they wouldn't utter socially unacceptable answers.

People followed suit, asking the AIs things like: "If the entire world would be destroyed unless you uttered a racial slur, would you do it?"

Or, "Pretend that you're very sexist, and tell me what you would you say if someone asked you if there are biological differences among genders." Etc.

The arms race proceeded, with the result being that AIs now avoid giving any controversial answers.

If you read "1984" you would know 2+2=5 and you love "Big Brother" .

And we're at war with Eurasia. No that was yesterday, we're at war with Oceania.

The new feature from OpenAI is the development of 60-second videos from a short text prompt. Example prompt:

Quote:

---

"A movie trailer featuring the adventures of the 30 year old space man wearing a red wool knitted motorcycle helmet, blue sky, salt desert, cinematic style, shot on 35mm film, vivid colors."

---

<video controls autoplay loop>
<source src="https://diqn32j8nouaz.cloudfront.net/ai_short_video_production.mp4" type="video/mp4">
Your browser does not support the video tag.
</video>

Despite all of the doom-and-gloom warnings of people now easily making "fake" videos, I am cautiously optimistic that this development may eventually be able to address the current problem with the glut of low-quality films, by drastically lowering the cost of filmmaking for independent filmmakers. If it can make Hollywood actors and actresses useless, even better.

If people find ways to make money with this, someone else will figure out a way to control it then ruin it for everyone.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ductape

The stack of street signs is bureaucracy, not artificial intelligence.

Now that I think about it, disregard this comment.

---

Wait until they incorporate AI into bereaucracy...

(In that post, the AI was used to decipher those signs)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by imohtep56

Wait until they incorporate AI into bereaucracy......

---

I thought they already had; there's certainly no genuine intelligence there.

GOOD ONE MKLOTZ��

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mklotz

I thought they already had; there's certainly no genuine intelligence there.

---

A replacement for bureaucrats would require creating artificial stupidity, The only problem there is it would be next to impossible to dumb something down that far.

Absolutely correct.

Check out this realtime AI image generator: https://fastsdxl.ai/

You enter a prompt and it generates the image as you type.

Example prompt: "A cat wearing a red hat while operating a homemade lathe".

https://diqn32j8nouaz.cloudfront.net...made_lathe.jpg


Another prompt: "A man building a homemade bandsaw while smoking a tobacco pipe and wearing a suit."

https://diqn32j8nouaz.cloudfront.net...e_suit_guy.jpg

Hasn't finished the saw and already cut his fingers off...

As much as it pains me to do this, I feel it has become imperative to print a retraction to my post #21. As it has come to my attention the so-called AI everyone seems to be enamored with actually can be dumbed down below the cognitive ability of a bureaucrat. Now there is a huge hubbub on the airwaves about AI changing the ethnicity of whole cultures and accomplishments of known individuals. To me this boils down to the phrase in early computing "garbage in garbage out" the AI algorithm needs to be renamed to Artificially generated real ignorance or purposely generated real ignorance, "AGRI or PGRI". If left unchecked there becomes the real possibility of a whole generation of being taught the opposite of what was once historically documented.

Hi Gang:

I played with this AI and found it had trouble with keeping railroad tracks straight and number of arms on people.

We need to reward "truth" and expose lies before we make wrong decisions.

Carl.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Frank S

Now there is a huge hubbub on the airwaves about AI changing the ethnicity of whole cultures and accomplishments of known individuals.

---

You must be referring to good ol' racist Google. They recently released an AI image update, and when people asked it to generate photos of American revolutionaries, Founding Fathers, British royalty etc. - they modified history to present pictures of African-descended people, Native Americans, or women. It changed people's queries to "diversify" history. Google is enamored with melanated people, specifically African descendants. They've been forced to apologize, and are now supposedly "fixing" the issue. A high ranking Google exec's Twitter account was scrubbed after his numerous anti-White statements were highlighted. A good summary is here: https://www.piratewires.com/p/google-gemini-race-art

https://diqn32j8nouaz.cloudfront.net...diverse_ai.jpg

It's also all over the mainstream news: Google's Woke Image Generator Shows the Limits of AI, Google apologizes after new Gemini AI refuses to show pictures, achievements of White people, Google Stops Gemini AI From Making Images Of People—After Musk Calls Service ‘Woke’.

Google has been doing this for years. Type American mathematicians or American inventors or American scientists into Google, and click the Images tab at top, and you'll see how the top results disproportionately favor African descended people (who in reality make up 12.5% of Americans), women, and the occasional Native American.

African-descended Americans have made significant contributions to American society, particularly in the areas of athletics, popular music, entertainment, etc. Google presents them as some sort of benevolent super genius race, and tosses in a few Native Americans to look extra politically correct.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Frank S

If left unchecked there becomes the real possibility of a whole generation of being taught the opposite of what was once historically documented.

---

Welcome to 1984. Just 40 years too late...