The standard idea of centralized generation is here. But a distributed model of generating electricity is also possible. And easier to work out on the existing electrical grid. I'm sure you know that the further from the generators you go the less the current capacity of the wiring available. That's one thing skipped over on the internet ideas.
Biggest problem is that companies make a lot of money doing this and the people owning them want to keep it that way. De-centralising the whole shooting match takes away all the bucks.
What could be done if profit was not the sole reason to do something.
Maybe smaller profits. But it'll never happen. A distributed grid of production is cheaper than a centralised system. Requires maintenance, and can be much more resilient to outages. Pretty much why it will be such a battle to ever do it.
Even here in Ontario Canada. American love to paint socialist on most things Canadian. The main producer of electricity ion the province of 18 million is partially owned by the province. There is a "delivery" charge for the electricity. Still waiting for the delivery truck to show up.... The fee is to refinance the nuclear reactors and their super expensive maintenance that pretty much finishe din the late 60's. Still paying for the reactors that make near 40% of the electricity here. The rest is natural gas and hydroelectric. Ontario has fully tapped out it's hydroelectric potential. Quebec, Manitoba and Labrabor are the areas where there are enormous untapped potentials. Manitoba being the toughest one as there needs to be near 900 mile million volt transmission line to get to the U.S. border. Yeah Canada is big. Texas is a small fry compared to the larger Canadian provinces. Texas is 40% smaller than Ontario, And just a week bit larger than each of the provinces to the west. Hey, geography killed no one!

LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks


Reply With Quote

Bookmarks