New: BuildThreads.com - 300+ build posts/day (with photos)
Don't want to get lost in semantics here, but I should point out technically that I believe these bolts measure preload as opposed to torque. And I guess the advantage here (and the justification for $20 bolts) is the ability to roughly measure that preload, and NOT just the torque used to attain the preload? Someone more knowledgeable than me can expand on this.
New: BuildThreads.com - 300+ build posts/day (with photos)
PJs (Feb 17, 2019)
From what I've gleaned from our structural engineers and my own experience and research, Jon is correct in that this is measuring pre-load of the bolt so that the amount of torque to get it to that point is not relevant. The problem with using Torque to set pre-load is that quality of the threads, lubrication all help or hurt the amount of torque.
For example, a lubricated bolt can exceed the designed pre-load amount well before the recommended torque is reached. Additionally, a dry or bungered thread can cause it to prematurely hit the recommended torque without actually getting any proper pre-load.
Critical applications are engine crank bearing journals, connecting rod journals, head bolts, wheel lug nuts and many more.
Many manufacturers have gone to a torque to angle system, where you tighten it to a pre-determined lower torque, and then use a specified additional angle to get to the approximate designed pre-load.
So for some of these applications, these types of bolts would be well worth the cost for reliability and performance.
Jon (Feb 17, 2019)
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks