Free 186 More Best Homemade Tools eBook:  
New: 300+ fresh build posts/day from 275 forums → BuildThreads.com

User Tag List

Results 1 to 10 of 12

Thread: Extension handle for a Starrett solid-rod inside micrometer set

Threaded View

  1. #1
    Supporting Member Paul Jones's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    Del Mar, California
    Posts
    1,232
    Thanks
    5,820
    Thanked 1,654 Times in 740 Posts

    Paul Jones's Tools

    Extension handle for a Starrett solid-rod inside micrometer set

    This is an extension handle for a Starrett solid-rod 2” to 12” inside micrometer set. The micrometer sets usually have a place in the case for storing the handle but it is something extra to buy. It is a simple addition to the set and rather than buying the 6 inch long handle, I made my own with a shorter 3.5" handle (shorter is easier to use).


    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Shorter Starrett-like inside mic handle.jpg 
Views:	521 
Size:	72.6 KB 
ID:	21156

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Starrett inside 2-12 inch mic set with homemade handle.jpg 
Views:	501 
Size:	100.9 KB 
ID:	21157


    I used 0.25” diameter 303 stainless steel rod to make the handle. The most challenging part of the machining was the 0.110” X 52 TPI thread that fits into the side of the micrometer. As you probably know, Starrett does not use “off-the-shelf” thread sizes for their tools (e.g., see my HMT article for making clamping screws for Starrett V-Blocks at http://www.homemadetools.net/forum/b...8166#post53090 ).

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Shorter Starrett-like inside mic handle with 52 TPI.jpg 
Views:	426 
Size:	75.1 KB 
ID:	21158

    The 0.110” X 52 TPI by 0.107” long thread does not have very much room for cutting threads and stopping the lathe cutting tool at the shoulder. I used the “upside down” threading tool technique that allows machining away from the headstock by running the spindle in reverse (clockwise) direction and leaving the lead screw in the towards the headstock direction but now the lathe carriage is moving away from the spindle as the spindle runs in reverse. This allows plenty of time to stop the cutting and return to the shoulder of the part for the next cut using a conventional single point threading method.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	NIKCOLE Mini-Systems tool holder and carbide thread insert.jpg 
Views:	471 
Size:	88.8 KB 
ID:	21159


    I used a very small carbide threading insert from NIKCOLE and the 3/8” square NIKCOLE Mini-Systems™ tool holder (ideally for the upside down technique it is best to use a left-hand tool holder to get closer to the shoulder but I only have the right-hand holders). I also used their 0.050” grooving insert in a ½” square tool holder to machine the 0.110” major thread diameter. The same grooving tool also cut the thread relief at the handle thread shoulder. The handle knurls are a cross cut 21 pitch size and this time I did not reduce the rod diameter because the difference in the ideal knurl diameter and the 0.250" diameter was only 0.007".

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Using upside down threading method for 52 TPI.jpg 
Views:	476 
Size:	72.5 KB 
ID:	21160


    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	NIKCOLE Mini-Systems tool holder and 0.050 inch grooving insert.jpg 
Views:	552 
Size:	88.4 KB 
ID:	21161


    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Knurling Starrett-like inside mic handle.jpg 
Views:	635 
Size:	82.0 KB 
ID:	21162


    Thank you for looking,

    Paul Jones


    P.S. You probably noticed that I use a CNC ER32 collet chuck held in a 6-jaw chuck. The 6-jaw chuck cannot hold the small diameter stainless steel rods and using the CNC ER32 collet chuck is a much faster setup than swapping out the D1-3 mounted 6-jaw tru-adjust chuck. The CNC ER32 chuck has almost no TIR and once you located and mark the optimum position with the least TIR when held in the 6-jaw chuck it is possible to limit the TIR to less than 0.0003" TIR.
    Last edited by Paul Jones; Jan 4, 2018 at 11:14 AM.

  2. The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to Paul Jones For This Useful Post:

    emu roo (Apr 1, 2026), Jon (Jan 3, 2018), mklotz (Jan 3, 2018), olderdan (Jan 3, 2018), PJs (Jan 4, 2018), rossbotics (Jan 8, 2018), Seedtick (Jan 3, 2018), tonyfoale (Feb 12, 2020), Toolmaker51 (Jan 5, 2018)

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •