Free 186 More Best Homemade Tools eBook:  
New: 300+ fresh build posts/day from 275 forums → BuildThreads.com

User Tag List

Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5
Results 41 to 49 of 49

Thread: "Flat Earth" photo, and why it's so hard to debunk pseudoscience

  1. #41
    Supporting Member Rattlerjake's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Posts
    73
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked 38 Times in 23 Posts
    Really? Sailors used to use, and some still use, a sextant for navigation. A sextant proves that the earth cannot be a sphere - https://www.bitchute.com/video/TKykKTqNwGV4/ This is also true with a theodolite.

  2. #42
    Supporting Member marksbug's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Posts
    1,969
    Thanks
    822
    Thanked 499 Times in 402 Posts
    hmm, I wonder what country's/continent's can be seen and what cant be seen from the moon. does that mean the others are fictitious? That they do not exzist?or that they are just hiding...hiding where??is the earth 2 sided?4 sided?6 sided? witch brings me back to..the earth is cubed with the corners misplaced...

  3. The Following User Says Thank You to marksbug For This Useful Post:

    Toolmaker51 (Dec 14, 2021)

  4. #43
    Supporting Member Toolmaker51's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Location
    Midwest USA
    Posts
    5,355
    Thanks
    7,074
    Thanked 3,569 Times in 2,209 Posts

    Toolmaker51's Tools
    Yes REALLY. Toolmaker51 was USN 26 years, 24+ as Quartermaster....Contrary to Army interpretation, Navy QM's are Navigators. I'm double shell back having crossed Equator twice, both in the gulf known as Indian Ocean, at Longitude 84° 30'.00''. Wound up just short of full circumnavigation; Navy operates more on logistics then novelties. None-the-less, that means also having transited several ocean expanses on any compass point within 360°. And damn, that telltale curved horizon not only directly ahead, astern, and any direction one might chose to look...underway or at full stop.
    Driving cross country, the only place with flat earth (note lower case letters) is Kansas, where flying over it corrects that assumption. Apologies to Kansas, 410 miles wide but eternity to cross.
    But wait, there's more!
    Courtesy Uncle Sam, and my own travels, have made a few transoceanic (Pacific) flights, seeing that identical curved horizon. Never changes; from hanger deck ~50' or bridge of aircraft carrier ~130', or aircraft port hole at ~35,000'. All those outside indisputable photos provided by world's various space organizations. Curvature they show at altitude IS different appearing; atmospheric diffusion, weather, land masses, and perspective of an 8" x 10", to name a few, but scale remains the same.
    Sextants remain in use regardless onset of electronics, not only to retain proficiency. It assures positions on a regular basis, should the electronics become inoperative or deactivated. Most capital chips, DR (dead reckoned) positions are updated every 30 minutes.
    A sextant does not depend on curvature to operate, any more than machinists protractor needs a plumb reference.
    Sextants have, can and without reason to cease, function as survey instruments in horizontal position; when observer selects a 'horizon' [telephone pole etc] and target(s). Goes without saying, that is minute in scale to astronomical distances.
    Question remains, where are those remaining 340°?
    A flat Earth, does it have hemispheres? If not, please explain why Coriolis Effect has two distinct actions separated by an Equator. A flat Earth does it have a North or a shitload of them?
    Directly related to that, assuming Earth is a flat plane, in whatever orientation imaginable, here's more.
    Why are polar routes [more or less N & S) used for certain flights?
    What made certain sea battles historically significant? Hint. They were conducted by forces without positions in view of each other; term for it escapes me.
    Oh yeah. Over the Horizon, that's it. Out of view visually, not to RADAR or scout planes.
    Why are flight-times from say, Lisbon, Portugal to San Francisco, CA of DIFFERENT duration than San Francisco to Lisbon, being roughly E & W?
    Why (how) was NASA able to calculate the Moon's own gravitational pull? Comparison of two bodies known size maybe? I say calculate, though guesstimate is more correct, being compositional density of Moon surface, mantle and core aren't as well known as that of Earth.
    One word hasn't collected a reply from the crowd yet, where in "orrery" opened my discourse. On nothing but centuries worth of observations and calculations, how does that man made device represent motions the heavens make; including eclipses, orbits, scale of (most) bodies and duration, constructed about 1751?
    Last edited by Toolmaker51; Dec 14, 2021 at 09:10 AM.
    Sincerely,
    Toolmaker51
    ...we'll learn more by wandering than searching...

  5. #44
    Supporting Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2018
    Posts
    636
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 131 Times in 111 Posts
    With my degree in Physics and all the Mechanical Engineering study - I appreciated most of the mathematical descriptions. Now retired, I still have an issue with "imaginary numbers" and I check off days on my calendar when I didn't need a differential equation, or even Algebra to enjoy my evening cocktail and Sunset.

  6. #45
    Supporting Member weedonald's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2025
    Posts
    10
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 2 Times in 1 Post
    But they keep on losing members who fall off the edge of the world so they're constantly recruiting to maintain their numbers!!!

  7. #46
    Supporting Member Philip Davies's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Location
    Reading, Berks, UK
    Posts
    1,085
    Thanks
    1,551
    Thanked 1,192 Times in 429 Posts

    Philip Davies's Tools
    Now here’s a thought. I am quoting from “New Scientist”, published online, today. “New Scientist” is a widely read, respected, weekly Science magazine.
    “Mathematically speaking, there are ways to translate perfectly what goes on in one reality into another reality that has fewerimensions. It means that the three dimensional world we move through could be no more real than a ghostly hologram, a mere projection from a deeper and altogether FLATTER TWO-DIMENSIONAL reality. “. (Capitals mine)

  8. #47
    Supporting Member weedonald's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2025
    Posts
    10
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 2 Times in 1 Post
    Philip.....if you think this premise adds any validity to your argument, remember that it is just one of many multi-dimensional universe conjectures, without any concrete research to back it up. I'd recommend you read what Dr. Neil Degras-Tyson has written on the concept of a 2 dimensional universe.

  9. #48
    Supporting Member Philip Davies's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Location
    Reading, Berks, UK
    Posts
    1,085
    Thanks
    1,551
    Thanked 1,192 Times in 429 Posts

    Philip Davies's Tools
    Quote Originally Posted by weedonald View Post
    Philip.....if you think this premise adds any validity to your argument, remember that it is just one of many multi-dimensional universe conjectures, without any concrete research to back it up. I'd recommend you read what Dr. Neil Degras-Tyson has written on the concept of a 2 dimensional universe.
    I know that. I am not making any argument: conjectures in science must yield to evidence.

  10. #49
    Supporting Member Frank S's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2015
    Location
    Peacock TX
    Posts
    12,611
    Thanks
    2,677
    Thanked 11,100 Times in 5,384 Posts

    Frank S's Tools
    Quote Originally Posted by Philip Davies View Post
    I know that. I am not making any argument: conjectures in science must yield to evidence.
    That doesn't seem to be a requirement for the global warming, global cooling, Climate change, all being caused by man, wackos on both sides of their arguments.



    2,500+ Tool Plans
    Never try to tell me it can't be done
    When I have to paint I use KBS products

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •