
Originally Posted by
piper184
Ignoring the scale of the person, if the cubes are relatively to scale it is a decent representation of the comparative values of metals.
Also, steel is a poor choice as it is not a raw material, iron would be more appropriate.
Comparing the metals to an arbitrary number assigned to a piece of paper is not very helpful.
A friend and I were discussing this the other day and we had some products with price stickers on them (remember those?) and we could determine the year by the sticker. I went back and compared those products to the "price" of gold at the time. The relationship between gold and the products has remained fairly constant across those 40 years. What has changed is the number assigned to the notes of paper we used as a medium of exchange.
Someone once said that in medieval times an ounce of gold would buy a really nice suit of clothes for a man, and today, that still holds true.
Interesting way to think about "prices" and "inflation"...
Bookmarks