Free 186 More Best Homemade Tools eBook:  
New: 300+ fresh build posts/day from 275 forums → BuildThreads.com

User Tag List

Results 1 to 10 of 640

Thread: Metric vs. other measurement systems - chart

Threaded View

  1. #11
    Supporting Member mklotz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2015
    Location
    LA, CA, USA
    Posts
    3,720
    Thanks
    376
    Thanked 7,190 Times in 2,348 Posts

    mklotz's Tools
    Quote Originally Posted by Crusty View Post
    ...I still know how to find the square root of a number with pencil and paper.
    I was taught that awkward system in grade school. I soon purged it from my memory bank. There's a much simpler way to find roots using Newton's method.

    Consider this iterative equation...

    x2 = (x1 + N / x1) / 2

    where:

    N = number whose root is to be found
    x1 = initial estimate of root
    x2 = improved estimate of root

    We make a guess of the root, x1, plug it into this equation and get an improved estimate, x2. If this estimate isn't good enough for out purposes, we set x1 = x2 and repeat the process to get an even better estimate. This iterative procedure is repeated until x2 squared is close enough to N to satisfy our requirements.

    An example will demonstrate. Let's find the square root of 6 (for reference, my calculator says 2.44949). Six is between 4 (2 squared) and 9 (3 squared) so a reasonable guess for x1 might be 2.5. Then

    x2 = (2.5 + 6/2.5)/2 = 2.45 (squared = 6.00250)

    Very close but let's do one more iteration...

    x2 = (2.45 + 6/2.45)/2 = 2.44949 (squared = 6.00000026)

    which would be good enough for most purposes.

    I can hear you saying, "Yeah, but you picked an initial guess that was very close to the actual value!" A valid objection so let's try it with an initial guess that's downright silly, 7. Remember, 7 squared is 49, and that's far enough from 6 that even a schoolkid would know it's not a good choice. In addition, the square root of a number can never be greater than the number so, since 7 is greater than 6, choosing it as a first guess is particularly dumb.

    x2 = (7 + 6/7)/2 = 3.9286

    x2 = (3.9286 +6/3.9286)/2 = 2.7279

    x2 = (2.7279 + 6/2.7279)/2 = 2.4637

    x2 = (2.4637 + 6/2.4637)/2 = 2.4495

    which, squared, is 6.0002..., close enough for the work I do. So, even with a laughable initial guess we got five significant figures in only four iterations. Clearly, one doesn't need to be a genius mathematician to make useful guesses.

    Of course, today most four-banger calculators have square root keys. My question is, why ? The average four-banger user wouldn't know a square root from a rutabaga.
    ---
    Regards, Marv

    Smart phones are to people what laser pointers are to cats
    Homo sapiens is a goal, not a definition

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to mklotz For This Useful Post:

    FEM2008 (Aug 17, 2020)

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •