Free 186 More Best Homemade Tools eBook:  
New: 300+ fresh build posts/day from 275 forums → BuildThreads.com

User Tag List

Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Myasishchev VM-T heavy transport aircraft - photo

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Supporting Member bruce.desertrat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    908
    Thanks
    698
    Thanked 878 Times in 468 Posts

    bruce.desertrat's Tools
    I remember the day (I was in 5th or 6th grade) one of the SuperGuppy planes flew overhead with some Saturn V parts for a moon mission. Also when They flew the last shuttle over the us https://www.flickr.com/photos/352457...7631583272803/

    It's ironic ours flew when the Buran didn't, but we're still (until recently) still dependent on a 1960s design Soyuz for access to ISS.

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to bruce.desertrat For This Useful Post:

    nova_robotics (Oct 10, 2020)

  3. #2
    Supporting Member Frank S's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2015
    Location
    Peacock TX
    Posts
    12,619
    Thanks
    2,677
    Thanked 11,115 Times in 5,394 Posts

    Frank S's Tools
    [QUOTE=bruce.desertrat;
    It's ironic ours flew when the Buran didn't, but we're still (until recently) still dependent on a 1960s design Soyuz for access to ISS.[/QUOTE]

    only because the USA space program was allowed to stagnate.
    The old sky lab should have never been allowed to reenter the atmosphere, it should have been boosted to a high lunar orbit for future use.
    Half of the shuttles could have been retired docked or tethered to the ISS or parked in a slightly higher orbit where orbital decay would require less fuel or corrections to keep them up there. Someday they are going to figure out that a lot of the obsolete stuff up there will be more valuable by already being there than boosting other materials to space
    Never try to tell me it can't be done
    When I have to paint I use KBS products

  4. #3
    Supporting Member mwmkravchenko's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Location
    Perth Ontario Canada
    Posts
    1,135
    Thanks
    5,729
    Thanked 565 Times in 386 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Frank S View Post
    only because the USA space program was allowed to stagnate.
    The old sky lab should have never been allowed to reenter the atmosphere, it should have been boosted to a high lunar orbit for future use.
    Half of the shuttles could have been retired docked or tethered to the ISS or parked in a slightly higher orbit where orbital decay would require less fuel or corrections to keep them up there. Someday they are going to figure out that a lot of the obsolete stuff up there will be more valuable by already being there than boosting other materials to space
    Sure go ahead and make sense! The entire problem is that the U.S. space industries are white elephants except SpaceX. Why think forward and economically when you can spend billions to make new ones?

    As for Old technology. If it doesn't break, why fix? Old technology includes far more efficient rockets as well. You are the last guy to ever need to tell that old is not a problem. Boeing's latest space capsule is a great example of bouncing baby teething problems. The entire ISS is a Soviet design licensed by the Americans. The Soviets had the most experience hands down on long term engineering for space applications.

    Skylab was a great idea that was scuttled for political reasons. As were the two fully designed single stage to orbit systems that were mothballed. All about politics and money. Not about what works.



    2,500+ Tool Plans

  5. The Following User Says Thank You to mwmkravchenko For This Useful Post:

    Frank S (Nov 28, 2021)

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •