The plane that appaertly flew down the street into the pentagon was also interesting, im thinking it would hit tons of street hardware before hitting the building and the media footage of that looks nothing like a plane. more like a missile.
Citizen of the "New democratic" Republic of Britain, liberated from the EuroNation
is it me or are they getting the timing a bit out
when the explosion is triggered the cloud of debris starts at the base of the building
it looks like triggering it more in time with the explosion would dampen more debris than having the water cannons launch their load to produce a thin water shower curtain to fall on the debris ?
Citizen of the "New democratic" Republic of Britain, liberated from the EuroNation
Perhaps the future of demolision is to burn aluminium and jet-a fuel inside.
Not meaning to be sick or impersonal but i recently watched a program relating to 911 where a UK engineer had provided expert opinion as to why the aircraft impact had been so sever to bring down the towers and put the myth to bed that explosives had been used. it didnt explain why tower 5 came down first (a smaller black tower to the west of the twin towers). Very little aircraft debris was found down on the street, most was contained within the floors and during the collapse. The claim that sections of the aircraft fell on tower 5 bringing it down is a far stretch.
Citizen of the "New democratic" Republic of Britain, liberated from the EuroNation
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks