Quote Originally Posted by MeJasonT View Post
All the poor women called Karen Oh and yes it is correct to use gender. apparently there are now 300 genders and that we should take into consideration a persons choice to be non binary, yeah but the science does not add up. We come from 2 chromosomes 1 male 1 female so yes you could get a she, he or he, she but not 300 variants. if they don't want to be considered male or female then they have to accept that they cant change DNA, guess what no male or female chromosome = no baby. What a person chooses to be or considers themselves as is entirely up to them, that's the great thing about living in a free society. I am getting a tad annoyed that by building an all inclusive society they have decided to exclude those who are binary and disagree with their doctoring. That is not being inclusive. When did education become so limp.
MeJasonT! Long time no see, I'd wondered about not seeing you pop up lately.

It'll be a cold day you know where before any of the 300 (as of 08:39 Central Daylight Time) will convince me to address them any fraction out of my perception, other than 'it'. There 2 genders, hence 2 groups of applicable labels. Nature allows certain mix-ups, just as in any mass produced item. The predominate feature is what it is.
To demand equality or considerations of any type is void when somebody adopts outsider. It is now 08:45, I'll bet 28 more classifications exist.