Quote Originally Posted by NeiljohnUK View Post
Whom ever drew that got it right on so many levels, the 'short' dress with over broad shoulders is especially pertinent with the growing number of 'male' identifying as 'female' athletes winning 'wimins' events.
Working in the University STEM sector I have worked with a number of very capable and talented female students, similarly when working for IBM (idiot bloody management) with a number of just as capable female engineers. If you look at Australia they now have a significant shortfall in the arts, humanities and social (pseudo) science courses and thats spreading throughout the 'Western' Universities, as more and more students, of all genders, reject courses that have little worthwhile output.
Gender, AKA grievance, studies have proven to be very divisive, as the beyond socialist left wingers want them to be, the s-too-dense that get sucked into that maelstrom of hate becoming clones (note the hair colour) of the intolerance spewing hatred generators that 'teach' them, that those courses mainly attract those that are morally, if not mentally, deficient wanting an easy ride and degree is unsurprising, any vestige of academic rigour is sadly lacking in most of those courses too.
You were doing really great until you veered off into "beyond socialist left wingers" and never came back.

As to what the cartoon is saying, I may actually have a little insight. My Dad, Howard Sparber, was a cartoonist for the Chicago Tribune and Chicago Syndicate. He would draw cartoons like this on occasion. When I asked him what he was trying to say, he would always put it back on me - "what is it saying to you?" His goal was always to stimulate discussion, not send a single message. Maybe this cartoonist is doing the same thing.

Rick