Free 186 More Best Homemade Tools eBook:  
New: 300+ fresh build posts/day from 275 forums → BuildThreads.com

User Tag List

Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: Visualization of Pi being irrational - GIF

  1. #1
    Supporting Member Altair's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    12,020
    Thanks
    1,365
    Thanked 31,315 Times in 10,051 Posts

    Visualization of Pi being irrational - GIF

    Visualization of Pi being irrational.




    Previously:

    Chaos theory demonstration - GIF
    Double pendulum chaos demonstration - GIF
    56-transition triple inverted pendulum - GIF
    Lemniscate of Bernoulli - GIF
    New: BuildThreads.com - 300+ build posts/day (with photos)

  2. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Altair For This Useful Post:

    cognitdiss (Jan 13, 2024), Inner (Jan 10, 2024), KustomsbyKent (Jan 11, 2024), nova_robotics (Jan 10, 2024), Philip Davies (Jan 11, 2024), rgsparber (Jan 10, 2024), tonyfoale (Jan 12, 2024)

  3. #2
    Supporting Member mklotz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2015
    Location
    LA, CA, USA
    Posts
    3,720
    Thanks
    376
    Thanked 7,192 Times in 2,348 Posts

    mklotz's Tools
    Another way to appreciate the infinite nature of the expansion of pi is to examine a trick used by programmers too lazy to memorize pi out to the precision their computer could handle.

    Most programming languages have a built-in arctangent function. Now, it's true that:

    arctan (1) = π / 4 (π/4 radians = 45 degrees)

    so:

    π = 4∙arctan (1)

    The inifinite series for arctan (1) looks like:

    arctan (1) = 1 - 1/3 + 1/5 - 1/7 + 1/9 - 1/11 + ...

    Since the series continues like that out to infinity, so does the decimal expansion of π.
    ---
    Regards, Marv

    Smart phones are to people what laser pointers are to cats
    Homo sapiens is a goal, not a definition

  4. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to mklotz For This Useful Post:

    Inner (Jan 10, 2024), rgsparber (Jan 10, 2024)

  5. #3
    Supporting Member rgsparber's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Phoenix, AZ
    Posts
    1,393
    Thanks
    802
    Thanked 3,097 Times in 744 Posts

    rgsparber's Tools
    It is interesting to think that our universe could not exist if Pi had a different value. The same is true for other mathematical constants. One theory is that there are an infinite number of universes, one for each value of these constants. It blows my mind!

    Rick
    Rick

  6. #4
    Supporting Member hemmjo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    Posts
    3,301
    Thanks
    410
    Thanked 2,131 Times in 1,230 Posts

    hemmjo's Tools
    Perhaps, it Is not that our universe could not exist unless Pi had this value. Rather it is that the universe does exist, as it does, because it does have this value.


    We do not know what would exist if it had some other value.

  7. #5
    Supporting Member rgsparber's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Phoenix, AZ
    Posts
    1,393
    Thanks
    802
    Thanked 3,097 Times in 744 Posts

    rgsparber's Tools
    Quote Originally Posted by hemmjo View Post
    Perhaps, it Is not that our universe could not exist unless Pi had this value. Rather it is that the universe does exist, as it does, because it does have this value.


    We do not know what would exist if it had some other value.
    And that is what challenges my mind!

    What is so special about the value of Pi? It helps us explain many things in our lives. Did the physical world come first and then Pi set to explain it or did Pi come first and the physical world confirmed to it?

    I look forward to seeing some brilliant experimental physicist proving it all.

    Rick
    Rick

  8. #6
    Supporting Member mklotz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2015
    Location
    LA, CA, USA
    Posts
    3,720
    Thanks
    376
    Thanked 7,192 Times in 2,348 Posts

    mklotz's Tools
    Newton characterized gravity as an inverse square force. It's good he did because, if that exponent differed from two even a tiny bit, stable orbits could not exist and our world could not exist. It's another example of "things are the way they are because it would be impossible for them to be any different".

    Now, if you like to soothe your insomnia with mind-bending questions, here's another one for you...

    Science has had amazing success using mathematics to understand our world and even predict things unknown that after being predicted were discovered. Now, is mathematics simply the handiwork of human genius or is it a fundamental of the universe that we are gradually discovering and putting to use?
    ---
    Regards, Marv

    Smart phones are to people what laser pointers are to cats
    Homo sapiens is a goal, not a definition

  9. #7
    Supporting Member rgsparber's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Phoenix, AZ
    Posts
    1,393
    Thanks
    802
    Thanked 3,097 Times in 744 Posts

    rgsparber's Tools
    I think the behavior is there and we discover the math that describes it. Change the math and the universe would laugh.

    Rick
    Rick

  10. The Following User Says Thank You to rgsparber For This Useful Post:

    Philip Davies (Jan 11, 2024)

  11. #8
    Supporting Member Philip Davies's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Location
    Reading, Berks, UK
    Posts
    1,085
    Thanks
    1,551
    Thanked 1,193 Times in 430 Posts

    Philip Davies's Tools
    Quote Originally Posted by rgsparber View Post
    I think the behavior is there and we discover the math that describes it. Change the math and the universe would laugh.

    Rick
    I agree. But, there is a large part of mathematics which do not relate to phenomena. You might argue, for example, that prime numbers are found in Nature, in the Fibonacci series. But a glance at a copy of Dictionary of Curious & Interesting Numbers reveals something called Graham number, which cannot be expressed at all using conventional notation, or powers of powers. There is an interesting chapter in “Pi in the Sky” by John Barrow, entitled transhuman mathematics. In it, the author asserts that there are non-computable functions. It was published in 1992
    Even the philosophy of mathematics is a wide subject and who can say they have mastered it?



    2,500+ Tool Plans

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •