Nothing is guaranteed.
Stupid is forever, ignorance can be fixed.
emu roo (Feb 11, 2026)
Two building demolitions at the same site provide a strong demonstration of the absurdity of the NIST conclusion of pancaking of the three WTC towers by the descending building upper floors.
The first, skinny tower appears to be about 23 stories tall. At the initial (and only) blast,the intact top 20 or so stories falls vertically down on to bottom 3 or 4 stories, then stops descending, slowly tips to the side and crashes sideways to the ground. Steel frame? No “pancaking observed. Possible that demo crew expected pancaking since no charges are seen above the bottom stories. Apparently the tipover was not anticipated since the observers in front of the camera jumped up and ran. If demo crew anticipated tipover one would expect them to announce the fact and have observers at a safe distance, not surprised into running. Perhaps failure of wiring to timed demo charges higher up in building? Round-ended building visible adjacent to the tipped-over tower.
Rubble from the first tipover has been cleared up when 25-story round ended building with about 3-story high ground floor level is demolished. Same failure of planning. Ground level support is blasted away and building descends vertically, crushing round floor and 2 or 3 of the residential floors, THEN STOPS and slowly tips to the side. Weight of almost the entire building is insufficient to “pancake” more that 2 or 3 floors after energy of descending building is absorbed by crushing the bottom few stories. Crew apparently consists of very slow learners to have two identical failures in succession at the same location. This tipover was clearly not anticipated (planned) judging from the many people scattering from the site. Additionally, two shacks or possibly a venicle and a shack of some sort were crushed by the building and possibly a shipping container was barely missed. Surely not planned.
Does that provide any insight into the WTC official story/
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks