Covid-19 Reality Check

[Rorschach]

What deception do you think is being carried out?

[IAMSatisfied]

What deception do you think is being carried out?

I am here specifically referring to Youtube's (Google's) practice of removing content deemed as "violating community guidelines". In this particular case the interview of these two doctors contained ideas/concepts that those who want to control the narrative, in this case Susan Wojcicki, CEO of Youtube, does NOT want you to be exposed to, because, according to Wojcicki, this interview was "problematic" and contained opinions that are (in her opinion) are "medically unsubstantiated", i.e. these doctors don't support the "vaccine narrative" that is currently being promoted by the AMA, MSM, Big-pharma, etc.

That "vaccine narrative" goes something like this: "Vaccines are ONLY good and never hurt anyone, they're the only and safest choice for the public's health. Vaccine producers are honest folks with pure motives and they never employ questionable practices. You can trust us... we wear white lab coats and have halos over our heads."

So, we have mega-giant Google, arguably the world's largest advertising agency, earning US$134.8 billion in 2019. The AMA, funded by Big-pharma, has a vigorous campaign/lobby to induce Big-tech companies to "stop spread of anti-vax information", even if it's a couple of doctors saying that it's good for a healthy person to be exposed to things like Covid-19 so they can exercise their immune system and develop antibodies & thus immunity to the virus. Oh, and they also said that, FROM THE DATA derived from ANTIBODY TESTING, we have a ~0.03% risk of death from the virus. This is NOT good news to fear & vaccination peddlers. It's also not good news to those with political motives who want to prolong the "shelter-in-place" orders.

To be clear, I AM NOT anti-vaccine. I believe *some* vaccines have been wonderful. I am, however, for the free expression, discussion, and dissemination of ideas, and that truth itself will dispel lies, not the internet censorship police. I personally don't think it's wise to introduce into the human body toxic metals, such as mercury and aluminum (both are neuro-toxic), which many/most vaccines contain, ostensibly as "preservatives". While I am no chemistry savant, I do know that there are other metals that are excellent anti-microbials (zinc, silver, copper), while also being safe and/or essential on a cellular level. So, my BIG question to the vaccine producers is, "Why are you using known toxic metals as preservatives when you could be using safer, essential and/or safe, non-toxic metals?"

For those believing that mercury is safe in small quantities, you might want to read this article from The Journal of Trace Elements in Medicine and Biology: https://reader.elsevier.com/reader/s...D027DC6FEEA5FA