Free 186 More Best Homemade Tools eBook:  
New: 300+ fresh build posts/day from 275 forums → BuildThreads.com

User Tag List

Results 1 to 10 of 11

Thread: Pantograph

Threaded View

  1. #6
    Supporting Member mklotz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2015
    Location
    LA, CA, USA
    Posts
    3,720
    Thanks
    376
    Thanked 7,192 Times in 2,348 Posts

    mklotz's Tools
    I couldn't find my notes describing how to calculate the spacing of the holes on the arms of the pantograph so I had to rethink the problem. (That doesn't bother me; frequently, on the second go-around, you'll see simplifications you missed the first time.) I decided to document the process here. That way someone who wants to build one can do it himself and I'll be able to find the derivation the next time I need it. :-)




    The attached diagram shows a pantograph set up for a roughly three to one enlargement. The notation is as follows:

    F = Fixed point
    T = Tracer point
    M = Marker point
    S = Slider point
    P, Q = Pivot points whose locations we wish to calculate

    In the computations, we'll let:

    R = pantograph Ratio

    If R>1, the drawing traced will be enlarged, if R<1 the final drawing will be smaller. In the diagram, R is approximately 3, so a three to one enlargement. The ratio allows us to relate FT and TM thusly...

    FM = R * FT
    TM = FM - FT = FT * (R - 1)

    Whatever, the spacings of the pivot hole P are, they must remain constant as the angle FPT changes; as we trace, we don't move pivot points around as that angle changes. Therefore, if we can calculate them for FPT = a right angle, we'll know them for all angles. Thus, for convenience, the diagram is drawn with FPT as a right angle.

    Now, FPT = 90, then SPT = 90 and, since PSQT is a parallelogram (it must be for the pantograph to work) , all its interior angles are right angles.

    By design, the length of the pantograph arms are equal so FS = SM. This implies that the angles SFM and SMF are equal. Since FSM = 90, it follows that FSM = 45 = FTP and FP = PT.

    Applying Pythagoras to the FPT triangle we now have:

    FP^2 + PT^2 = FT^2

    but FP = PT so:

    2 * FP^2 = FT^2

    or:

    FP = FT/sqrt(2).

    and

    PS = FS - FP = TQ

    So, once you've picked a convenient length for FT based on your maximum value of R and the chosen stick length, FS, you can find FP from FT/sqrt(2) and PS from the latter equation.

    Isn't geometry wonderful?
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	001.jpg 
Views:	444 
Size:	101.6 KB 
ID:	24417  
    Last edited by mklotz; Jun 18, 2018 at 02:38 PM.
    ---
    Regards, Marv

    Smart phones are to people what laser pointers are to cats
    Homo sapiens is a goal, not a definition

  2. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to mklotz For This Useful Post:

    baja (Aug 1, 2020), Frank S (Jun 18, 2018), PJs (Jun 18, 2018), Sleykin (Jun 8, 2022), Toolmaker51 (Jun 18, 2018)

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •