Good advices for a newbie (threading tools lathe)

[PJs]

Thanks for the update pics Stefano. I hear both of you on the cold shop...mine was 45º F yesterday.

Looks like you made a mic holder also for your new EMC8000?

Curios what the depth of the cone will be based on the 1k-20k response on the driver? Is it some exact multiple of the wavelengths (1/f) of that frequency range (.0001 to .00005) to achieve some sort of resonance in the cone? With the exit port being 1.000" it seems you have the opportunity to tune the range a bit with the depth of the cone and of course the shape.

This all has me quite intrigued and really looking forward to how it all works out. Think I'll do some research on horn design!!

Thanks again! ~PJ

[C-Bag]

Curios what the depth of the cone will be based on the 1k-20k response on the driver? Is it some exact multiple of the wavelengths (1/f) of that frequency range (.0001 to .00005) to achieve some sort of resonance in the cone? With the exit port being 1.000" it seems you have the opportunity to tune the range a bit with the depth of the cone and of course the shape.

WOW, who was that masked man!?!?!?



you go Wiz!

[rendoman]

many thanks!

good physical activity is healty for the body! hope that the temperature raise fast ... here we'll have the next 2 months colder

the range 1k-20khz is the "recommended" by rcf, in my opinion this driver sound good from at least 1500\2000hz to 10000hz, no more. under 1,5k and over 10k in my opinion it sounds bad and not so loud. I post a couple of pic of datasheet of the "new type" with neodimium magnet, i had a paper of fq response of my ferrite driver, it has 108db\w\m (1less than neod) and a bit more range up to 10khz. In my opinion it needs courage to claim the driver usable from 1 to 20k ... but the component is intended for pro audio... than...

you're right, there is some "tuning" opportunity. In my big horn i tried to settle both front and rear chamber for working togheter, basically not only the dept but the volume. Horn is an "air trasformer", unfortunately i have to find my old papers where i wrote the formulas, i got weak memory . I remember that a front chamber (not compression) introduce a high pass filter, but in this case it's not our problem
Here we got a pre-tuned solid compression chamber that is the back of the driver, and we don't need to add a filter before the throat. With this kind of horn in my opinion only shape, cut-off and material are importants.
I tried some really ugly horns in plaster and cement, really bad internal surface as you can see, they sound good! I think that the real "tuning" is choosing the right cut-off frequency of the horn during design, not too low or the high freq will be cut, not too high or lowest freq of driver will be cut ...

...in few words, for this horn, we have to choose the cutoff with head (and shape for the right use). imho only bass horns have narrow range of fq (mine big are 150-350hz realistic) horns up to 1khz have less issues

[PJs]

This thread just got my thinking cap on...no cape or mask, C-Bag but thanks for your kindness!!

Stefano: I downloaded the HF94 spec sheet which goes back to my question above about the total depth of the horn. The HF94 is 135mm which leads me to believe that you will add another piece to the flange above. ?? I would think the length is quite important to minimize the drop in pressure/db and maintain the dispersal and f response. This makes sense as the dispersion curves for the HF94 are quite good at 2, 4 & 8k and match the driver output well. Also agree they are hard pressed to prove the 20khz top end with a 10db drop off after 10k!!

What was interesting to me about the HF94 in the cross section view is the radial transition just above (no dimensions) exit port. I would imagine this straight section is part of the air motion chambering you speak of to increase the pressure into the actual cone. My hit is it is a tuned resonance chamber 1"ID x X"length (1/f function) to achieve greater pressure prior to the cone.

This is where I am at a bit of a loss to calculate the dimensions based on a range of frequencies. The driver curves above have a nice little rise at about 2500hz and may be a good number to shoot for cut off?? This might give you the power/pressure point to get it out through the cone and minimize losses?? It might also be good to include the pre-chamber dimensions (diaphragm to exit point) in the calcs because it has good/solid/3D pre-chambering and will probably be modified by the additional coupling, at least to the cone transition. What is the f range you are shooting for over all?

Seem to be drooling here...Thanks! ~¿@

PJ

[rendoman]

PJ you're right! that's only the flange, i have to made the real horn from the big round bar of 130mm dia.
Lenght is really important in the main horn profile, imho it's not so important adding a straight short cylindrical flange of the same dimensions of driver exit, but it's good only for diaphragm driver type). conversely adding short cyl after a cone makes differences. with cone the throat area of the horn is generally smaller than the the area of the cone, that's normal in order to obtain more pressure at mouth.
interesting point of view! you see good the range of the driver is between 2k-10k,impedence is not so high in 1k, but not so low.... imho for a PA speaker is good, for home ... eh!
If we have to make an horn for a driver, it should have lower cutoff freq, for exemple: rcf from 1 to 20k, mid horn cutoff should be 800 or 700hz.

I remember someone modified in the past the rear chamber of some driver, maybe to obtain a bit more bass. I always knew that after a driver starts a simple horn , and no additional chambers needed.
i'm a self-taught, for sure I havnt the truth in my hand, the only thing i can do is reading, getting some formulas and making experiments

at the moment the flange has only a 10mm hole for locking on the milling machine, i left 15mm dia, when i will be near to complete the horn i will add the flange and i will fillet the 2 parts together.

the project in the first pic is old, i made i think 3 years ago. the profile is the same.
The bad thing is that i'm learning to do things... i make one mistake after another

[rendoman]

I think i need some new inserts... or have to learn to grind very sharp blade for alu...
... the part begins to take shape!

[PJs]

Looking Real Good Stefano!! Pretty impressive lathe and horizontal mill you have. What are the models?

Sorry I hadn't answered your previous post as I have been busy with some research on horn design. Found some interesting stuff out there. Better to keep my mouth shut when I was up to my ears in it!

Martin King has some pretty impressive write ups with formulas and serious math, particularly on front loaded horn design and theory. There was more out there I found but this suited my liking for learning.

From what I gleaned from his front loaded horn paper it seems to me the that the length of the 1" exit channel does have an impact on the frequency range and SPL...although I read it quickly and may have misinterpreted his meaning¿

As for the fc it seems to me that it would be better to be just below the flat part of the curve...1.7k~2k maybe, to be able to keep just what you want. You could also add another filter at say12K to keep all the mids clean and within the capability of the driver. What made you choose the 7-800 range for fc?

Thanks for sharing your build with us!! ~PJ

[C-Bag]

Interesting stuff.

I would like to see details how the inner contour of the horn is done to match the print and to make them both the same. You guys have left me in the dust so I will continue from the peanut gallery.

[rendoman]

Hi
The mill is a type zero of CST, it's a factory 30km away from my home town. I found some years ago a Kondia (Bridgeport style) but too heavy, the shipping was a disaster due to my narrow Street... I changed the water pump and the main engine, from 1hp dahlander 3phase 380 to 2hp 230v monophase and new bearings.

The lathe i think is an old Grazioli fortuna (maybe 150 model), i say that because i see a close lathe with this name in the metal plate. No marks at all, outside and inside. I think it's a transition model between old lathe with leather belt and curvy leg base and "modern" trapezoidal belt. It's equipped with bronze brush, 3 gears main shaft and 4 gears for automatic ( longitudinal and transverse). 3cv- 2.2kw engine


CST snc - ZERO

CST snc - ZERO - caratteristiche

i can't remember where i read to setup freq cutoff 100hz (from 100 to 200) lower the starting frequency of the speaker, one things i see is that the choice of cutoff can really make the difference in range. for exemple, the big horn of my speaker should have 80hz cutoff, this horn in my opinion can be used from 150hz and the upper limit is between 350 and 400hz , basically not only due to cutoff but to a coefficient that rules range and efficency.
more the frequency, less the problems. up to 1000hz cutoff horns are tiny and "similar". imho problems are under 1000hz, for example my rcf driver with old 4\500hz cutoff sounded strange, not extendend, not focused, same material but smaller 800hz made great difference!

I'm searching for an old site with a beautiful java tractrix and hyperbolic calculator, fullrange single driver site (maybe it changed name, maybe it doesn't exist anymore). good theory with formulas, exemple, tqwp, horn and project with lowther and a large number of drivers...
i found this site, it's not like the original...

Site Browser

I have to search 2 pdf with a good calculation, maybe too specific and hard to read, but useful... i hope i'll find!

... and the inner contour... a big problem... i have to do by hand ... a template Always near the cylinder, light movements, and i suppose as i did for the last small horn: rasp, file and huge sand paper work... and a lot of patience

[PJs]

Thanks for the info Stefano! Both mill and lathe look pretty substantial and good specs on the mill.

I took a look at the "Site Browser" site and seemed pretty good. I found the last paragraph of the first link interesting.

"For midrange and tweeter horns, many of the
tractrix horn advantages are lost if the horn curve is terminated before the
full, right-angle turn is reached. Unwanted edge diffractions would be created
by the sharp edges of such a mouth. Thus no provision is made for the reduction
of circular cross-section horns."

The formulas there looked to be valid and could probably be done in Excel/spreadsheet, but it still comes back to that fc and in the case of a midrange the wavelength is very short (800hz = .0013) so I would assume it needs to be multiples instead of fractional...or just tiny. Assumptions have a way of biting me back though~ @¿@ ...Thoughts?

The boring bar looks pretty good although those inserts don't seem to have a rake to them and may cause a bit of issue. Look forward to seeing how it works...think I might try it on something other than your part, first. ~¿@ Have you thought of maybe using a Graver to take off the tops of your steps? The depth may be a bit tricky to hold onto and need a rest to reach in there.