Free 186 More Best Homemade Tools eBook:  
Get 2,000+ tool plans, full site access, and more.

User Tag List

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 22

Thread: Piston Ring Locator

  1. #11
    Supporting Member Toolmaker51's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Location
    Midwest USA
    Posts
    5,330
    Thanks
    7,041
    Thanked 2,977 Times in 1,892 Posts

    Toolmaker51's Tools
    Quote Originally Posted by Rikk View Post
    My first homemade tool post!

    So I whipped up this little tool from a used piston to make it easier. The length between the top and bottom of the tool is within .003" all the way around, so much more accurate.
    As I get in other engine types for rebuild, I will make the same tool for each.

    Attachment 33082
    Very good idea. I believe you could solve the .003 OOS issue easily.
    The process of manufacturing washers [punching ID, stamping OD] does not insure flat parts. Next, surface of cast piston is likely not dead perpendicular to skirt, especially in 3 locations. Finally, small relative area of cap screw could 'dent' each washer into different cup shapes.

    Use 3 smaller, narrower [there fore stiffer] contacts held the same way. 3/16" keystock, dowel pins, etc. 3 points of contact is always stable, yet no assurance each is on same plane.
    Just like surveyor's tripod, adjustable legs AND leveling jackscrews.

    186 More Best Homemade Tools eBook
    Sincerely,
    Toolmaker51
    ...we'll learn more by wandering than searching...

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to Toolmaker51 For This Useful Post:

    Rikk (Jan 15, 2020)

  3. #12
    Supporting Member olderdan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2016
    Posts
    781
    Thanks
    1,456
    Thanked 1,531 Times in 463 Posts

    olderdan's Tools
    Quote Originally Posted by Toolmaker51 View Post
    Very good idea. I believe you could solve the .003 OOS issue easily.
    The process of manufacturing washers [punching ID, stamping OD] does not insure flat parts. Next, surface of cast piston is likely not dead perpendicular to skirt, especially in 3 locations. Finally, small relative area of cap screw could 'dent' each washer into different cup shapes.

    Use 3 smaller, narrower [there fore stiffer] contacts held the same way. 3/16" keystock, dowel pins, etc. 3 points of contact is always stable, yet no assurance each is on same plane.
    Just like surveyor's tripod, adjustable legs AND leveling jackscrews.
    Agreed anything can be refined but a.003 thou error is acceptable for this application and is better than using a sloppy unringed piston to square a ring in a bore, you will be relying on touch with a feeler gauge for the final measurement. Most of my work is one offs otherwise I would copy this idea.

    2000 Tool Plans

  4. The Following User Says Thank You to olderdan For This Useful Post:

    Toolmaker51 (Jan 15, 2020)

  5. #13
    Rikk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2018
    Posts
    115
    Thanks
    248
    Thanked 80 Times in 42 Posts

    Rikk's Tools
    Quote Originally Posted by olderdan View Post
    Agreed anything can be refined but a.003 thou error is acceptable for this application and is better than using a sloppy unringed piston to square a ring in a bore, you will be relying on touch with a feeler gauge for the final measurement. Most of my work is one offs otherwise I would copy this idea.
    True, in this application I have an .008-.016 tolerance, so a few thou tilt won't change things much. Normally file for .008, recheck then hone the corners and check again. Generally end up with .009-.010 in the end.

    The bores in these things are surprisingly resilient. First thing to go is the overhead rockers/cam. Always because of dirty oil plugging the oil system. People think these things will run forever without changing the oil.

  6. The Following User Says Thank You to Rikk For This Useful Post:

    tonyfoale (Jan 29, 2022)

  7. #14
    Supporting Member tonyfoale's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Location
    Spain
    Posts
    1,549
    Thanks
    679
    Thanked 2,628 Times in 705 Posts

    tonyfoale's Tools
    Quote Originally Posted by Rikk View Post
    62? Just a pup in racing years. As long as you can crouch and lean, you can still ride.

    I originally did some laps on my friends bike in a parking lot and loved it. He knows I've ridden my entire life and told me if I got my racing license he would let me campaign his bike for a day. So I did and loved it. When time and life permit, I would love to build a bike to run now and again.
    Unfortunately, I am not 62 anymore.
    Be careful if you try racing again, it is highly additive and takes over.

  8. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to tonyfoale For This Useful Post:

    Rikk (Jan 15, 2020), Toolmaker51 (Jan 15, 2020)

  9. #15
    Supporting Member Toolmaker51's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Location
    Midwest USA
    Posts
    5,330
    Thanks
    7,041
    Thanked 2,977 Times in 1,892 Posts

    Toolmaker51's Tools
    I'm not familiar with small industrial type motors, and my visualizations tend to minimize deviations. .003 on a small bore is not very consequential; it will alter measurable gap as bore increases. So the easier technique might felt tip a particular point to index the gap each time. Then angled or not, moving to file, replacing to check would create least possible variation.
    Sincerely,
    Toolmaker51
    ...we'll learn more by wandering than searching...

  10. The Following User Says Thank You to Toolmaker51 For This Useful Post:

    Rikk (Jan 15, 2020)

  11. #16
    Supporting Member tonyfoale's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Location
    Spain
    Posts
    1,549
    Thanks
    679
    Thanked 2,628 Times in 705 Posts

    tonyfoale's Tools
    Quote Originally Posted by olderdan View Post
    Agreed anything can be refined but a.003 thou error is acceptable for this application and is better than using a sloppy unringed piston to square a ring in a bore, you will be relying on touch with a feeler gauge for the final measurement. Most of my work is one offs otherwise I would copy this idea.
    I am amazed that there seems concern over a 0.003" error. As Alan says that is acceptable. It is a very simple calculation that over a bore diameter range of 50 to 100 mm that error represents an off square error range of 0.086 to 0.043 degrees, which is totally inconsequential. The difference in the ring gap would not be measurable with garage feeler gauges.

  12. The Following User Says Thank You to tonyfoale For This Useful Post:

    Rikk (Jan 15, 2020)

  13. #17
    Supporting Member Isambard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2019
    Location
    Hawke's Bay, New Zealand
    Posts
    156
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 53 Times in 35 Posts
    Another who had dalliance with road racing, last century...
    Last edited by Isambard; Jan 28, 2022 at 07:05 PM.

  14. #18
    Supporting Member Isambard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2019
    Location
    Hawke's Bay, New Zealand
    Posts
    156
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 53 Times in 35 Posts
    I was taught by my father, a garage owner, that best practice
    was always to measure the ring gap in the unworn portion of
    the bore, namely below where the rings ran, the gap would
    always be smallest there.

  15. #19
    Supporting Member Toolmaker51's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Location
    Midwest USA
    Posts
    5,330
    Thanks
    7,041
    Thanked 2,977 Times in 1,892 Posts

    Toolmaker51's Tools
    Quote Originally Posted by Rikk View Post
    Thank you!
    I've been turning wrenches since I was a boy,...<<<snip>>>
    These are just golf carts, but my and my friends business names are on it. Everything gets the same level of attention to detail, be it a golf cart or one of my son's dirt kart racing engines. To me, it provides a mental satisfaction to know I have made it as close to perfect as I can.
    I think exactly the same way; by way of the things we used to buy had one man's or assembled men's names very closely associated with those products. That slid downhill a long way as trend toward made up words came about. "Rebranding they say", no it's DE-branding. "It more closely aligns with our customer base", hah, what of those who fueled the success? Pick one, them or new ones who can't spell or write full sentences?
    Sincerely,
    Toolmaker51
    ...we'll learn more by wandering than searching...

  16. The Following User Says Thank You to Toolmaker51 For This Useful Post:

    Rikk (Jan 31, 2022)

  17. #20
    Supporting Member tonyfoale's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Location
    Spain
    Posts
    1,549
    Thanks
    679
    Thanked 2,628 Times in 705 Posts

    tonyfoale's Tools
    Quote Originally Posted by Isambard View Post
    I was taught by my father, a garage owner, that best practice
    was always to measure the ring gap in the unworn portion of
    the bore, namely below where the rings ran, the gap would
    always be smallest there.
    It simply makes no sense to set the ring gap in the part of the stroke that does not see the rings.

  18. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to tonyfoale For This Useful Post:

    Rikk (Jan 31, 2022), Toolmaker51 (Jul 19, 2022)

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •