Free 186 More Best Homemade Tools eBook:  
New: 300+ fresh build posts/day from 275 forums → BuildThreads.com

User Tag List

Results 1 to 10 of 48

Thread: Power Hack Saw help needed

Threaded View

  1. #7
    Jon
    Jon is online now Jon has agreed the Seller's Terms of Service
    Administrator
    Supporting Member
    Jon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Colorado, USA
    Posts
    28,440
    Thanks
    8,490
    Thanked 44,298 Times in 13,047 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by whome View Post
    In the US, even a still valid patent does not prohibit you from making one for your personal use, you just can't make them to sell.
    We often see people saying that we are allowed to reproduce patented inventions for personal use; I would criticize you for repeating this, but I've made the same mistake myself! After researching it more thoroughly, here's what I think is happening:

    First of all: US patent law forbids making or using patented inventions, even for personal use. These days, this is usually for a period of 20 years.



    More: https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/35/271

    Why do we get this wrong so frequently? My theory: it's caused by conflating patent law with the fair use doctrine of copyright law. Certain uses of copyrighted material are considered to be perfectly legal "fair use". There are four factors used to weigh fair use in copyright:

    1. purpose and character of the use
    2. nature of the copyrighted work
    3. amount and substantiality
    4. effect on the market

    The "purpose and character" factor specifically includes whether the use is commercial or non-profit. And of course the "effect on the market" factor focuses on commerciality. So, if you have a non-profit use of a copyright that's not significantly impacting the market of the copyrighted work, you often have a strong claim to fair use.

    Here's the rub: the concept of fair use applies to US copyright law, but NOT to US patent law. I'm not sure why this is, but I think that's the source of the frequent confusion.

    Internet armchair lawyering aside: litigation over someone making a patented device for personal use is extremely rare, and usually not cost-effective. The worst I've ever seen, in almost two decades on forums, is a patent owner complaining to a forum admin about someone posting a how-to about making the patent owner's invention. It is almost never worthwhile to sue over this type of hobbyist use.

    I believe there is also another nuance regarding making patented inventions solely for the purpose of research, but I would need to confirm this with an IP lawyer before understanding it fully. Let me know if anyone knows more about this.

    I agree with all of your other points. The vast majority of patents are expired, searching patents is a great way to get ideas, and - in a healthy society - the government wants people to examine all of the public patent documents and drawings so that we can advance each others' inventions.
    New: BuildThreads.com - 300+ build posts/day (with photos)

  2. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Jon For This Useful Post:

    DIYer (Oct 5, 2017), Paul Jones (Oct 5, 2017)

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •