Making an air fishing cannon

[Floradawg]

These used to be common here then the scum in the police gang decided that they had to be classified as firearms and a license was needed to own and operate. These are the same scum who along with every single politician illegally broke the contract licensed firearm owners had with the state in order to start charging on-going fees while at the same time deliberately arming all the other career criminals and gangs to drive up crime involving firearms in order to facilitate a 'gun grab', and then they destroyed all the ownership records.
Silver lining is that now the politicians are worried because they have absolutely no idea how many firearms are in the country, what they are, where they are or who has them.
Ruined what used to be a fun day at the beach.

The main thing that keeps liberals up at night is the thought that somewhere, someone is having fun.

[Toolmaker51]

The main thing that keeps liberals up at night is the thought that somewhere, someone is having fun.

We can all imagine other ways to keep liberals awake all night, though as recipients, they wouldn't find it much fun.

Far as firearms go, a good loophole remains when they connect firearm with term 'explosive'. Firearm smokeless propellants DO NOT explode, they burn rapidly when contained, many fizzle weakly in open air. It should give prosecutors fits to find a danger in a large handheld tube dependent on a separate compressor or
un-powered air tank. Another is when they attach term 'rifling or rifle', smoothbores haven't much aiming potential.

Illegitimately, governments use "gun", "firearm", "weapon" and such terms with such abandon, but ignore simplest ones, with "crime" at head of the line. Crime control is just window dressing, bait for liberals, and terrific hole to dump study funds. Are not predictable results decent proof of agendas?


Meanwhile, the bait projector could be re-identified.

[Floradawg]

We can all imagine other ways to keep liberals awake all night, though as recipients, they wouldn't find it much fun.

Far as firearms go, a good loophole remains when they connect firearm with term 'explosive'. Firearm smokeless propellants DO NOT explode, they burn rapidly when contained, many fizzle weakly in open air. It should give prosecutors fits to find a danger in a large handheld tube dependent on a separate compressor or
un-powered air tank. Another is when they attach term 'rifling or rifle', smoothbores haven't much aiming potential.

Illegitimately, governments use "gun", "firearm", "weapon" and such terms with such abandon, but ignore simplest ones, with "crime" at head of the line. Crime control is just window dressing, bait for liberals, and terrific hole to dump study funds. Are not predictable results decent proof of agendas?


Meanwhile, the bait projector could be re-identified.

Oh yeah! On this side is an assault rifle. Notice the flash suppressor. On the other side is an identical firearm but without the evil looking flash suppressor. This one we reluctantly approve.

Remember that one?