Watch the end part of the video. The heat considerations are explained there. See response to your point 4.
I did not mention rheostat. It never occurred to me that anyone would try to control the speed in that way. A rheostat is more like a torque control than it is a speed control. Totally unsuitable.
These are rotating armature motors and so most of the losses will be in the rotating bits and the cooling heat path will be out through the bearings and the pulley. Cooling air over the outside body will have only a small effect, on the other hand cooling air on the inside, as per a stock motor is effective. On the other hand the common squirrel cage induction motors have a fixed armature attached to the casing and so air drawn over the outside of the casing will cool. That is why those motors often have external fins with a fan designed to flow air over the fins and not through the inside. All motors are not equal.
You can just as easily put the sensor magnet on any pulley. If the treadmill motor controller is available then that is certainly the easiest way to get a speed control. I do not use one because they have built in delays and other safety features which make the control feel unresponsive. I use the PWM feature of an Arduino to drive a couple of IGBTs. Instant response.
I don't know why there is any debate on this. Flat belts have been used for hundreds of years to drive machinery and the correct methods are well known. I thought the explanation that you mention was on this forum but a search did not throw it up so I have made a new post Why flat belts need crowned pulleys.
Watch the end part of the video. I do not think that I would use one of these motors on a belt grinder. Semi-continuous high loads need cooling air through but the air will contain a lot of dust, even with a dust control vac. A T&C grinder generates very different conditions.

LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks

Reply With Quote


Bookmarks